RIP Microsoft WordPad. You Will Be Missed::It’s truly the end of an era as we say farewell to a real one.

  • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    WordPad is what MS Word should be. It’s most of what everyone needs in a word processor and it’s lightweight. MS Word is becoming a bloated nightmare of toolbars and creeping featuritis.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is becoming? It already has been for decades. I think the extent of adding an entire VBA automation backend was somewhere near the tipping point…

      Fortunately LibreOffice is a thing for anyone who wants a $0 rich text capable editor, and I’m sure there are a zillion other alternatives by now both open source and not.

      • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, “becoming” is a strange choice of wording… Word has been bloated and overkill for 2 decades at this point.

        Libre Office is still bulky for anything I want on my PC. If I’m going to do any serious writing, I’m using Google Docs for backups and such. If I’m doing quick txt edits I’m using Sublime or Notepad. I use wordpad for stuff in the middle so I will definitely miss it and not sure how to solve this problem.

        That said, I’m not fucking installing Win 11 so guess this isn’t a problem till 12.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            11 months ago

            Right? Even setting aside the inevitable “have you considered Linux?” chat, if you’re the kind of person who refuses to install Windows 11, why would you be sure you’ll install Windows 12?

            We’ve seen nothing to suggest Windows won’t just continue to get less usable, more bloated, more spyware-ridden, and just generally more anti-consumer.

              • Aa!@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Well I have good news for you, the TPM can’t do those things. The TPM is just a hardware module that stores cryptographic keys in a tamper-resistant chip, and can perform basic crypto functions.

                In of itself, it can’t be addressed remotely, but it is usually used as a component of a greater security scheme. For example, in full disk encryption, it can be used to ensure that disk can’t be decrypted on a different device.

                There’s been a lot of FUD surrounding TPMs, and it doesn’t help that the actual explanation of their function isn’t something easily described in a couple of sentences.

                There’s no reason to be afraid of a TPM, and for the privacy-minded and security-conscious, it can even be used as part of a greater security scheme for your device and its data.

                Of course at the same time, it’s not a feature most home users would make full use of, and as for not liking Windows, carry on. There’s plenty of reasons to avoid it if those things are important to you

                • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  May I ask a question out of curiosity? If my system dies on a hardware level, and I have to save my hard drive, how can I access it then if I can’t put it in another system?

            • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              why would you be sure you’ll install Windows 12?

              I’m not, my post said this isn’t an issue till 12, as in, I’m not even considering 11, but I will consider 12.

              That said, you can’t stay on 10 forever without losing modern software support and modern drivers and security updates after EOL… So you basically HAVE to move at some point. My point was just in not touching 11. But it’s unlikely that you’ll be able to keep a Win 10 device running till 13 so… It’s either 11 or 12 and with the way Microsofts cycles go, 12 likely will be better than 11.

              If not… Well… Maybe Linux and proton will have caught up and Nvidia will actually make drivers etc etc. But not worth worrying about that yet.

            • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Up to XP I used several dos versions, win3.1, 95, 98, 98SE, and then XP. From there I skipped one version, so 7, then 10. Worked out pretty well so far. So my next windows will hopefully also be 12, and I hope it will have a better UI than 11.

              Linux is also interesting, but I like gaming without fiddling too much with my operating system, I just don’t want to commit my rare spare time to that. I want install -> play.

              • kwedd@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Linux is also interesting, but I like gaming without fiddling too much with my operating system, I just don’t want to commit my rare spare time to that. I want install -> play.

                With Proton, running Windows games from Steam has become pretty much click-and-play. If you do all your gaming through Steam, most games just work.

          • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            For the same reason I’m not still running 7…because you can’t actually stay on one version forever. I’m going to put the whole Linux thing aside because… Yeah, that’s a topic of its own and I think anyone with half a mind knows the reasons why Linux isn’t everyone’s first choice.

            But at some point Win 10 will reach EOL and will stop receiving updates. It’ll stop receiving new versions of DirectX etc. People will stop making drivers for it. Software will start requiring things in newer versions of Windows, etc. The list goes on, but inevitably you have to update.

            Luckily with Windows, you can usually skip one full release, but you can’t really make it past 2. Hence why I said 12. Am I crazy about the way 12 is shaping out? No. But you’d be crazy to think that you can just remain on 10 forever so I’m being realistic.

            Also, Windows is well known to have a shitty even/odd cycle where every other release sucks and the alternating ones are less bad. So hopefully 12 will be the same. For example, 95 was really good, 98 was meh, XP was fantastic, ME/2000 are kind of a joke, Vista sucked, 7 was good enough, 8 was miserable, 10 was okay, 11 is awful… So if the pattern continues, 12 should be better than 11 at least.

            I didn’t think this actually needed an answer but… Maybe I’m getting old and am too used to Microsofts cycles. Also, my point was “this isn’t a problem till 12” meaning, I’m not touching 11 so it doesn’t even matter till I start considering 12. Never said I was definitively doing it.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              2000

              yeah someone never used nt4 would think that. gha.

              Windows 2000 pro and server 2000 were enormous steps up in QOL and functionality.

              • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I did in fact use them. Most consumers didnt. Not really worth going to the in and out intricacies when the majority of people brushed past 2000 and never touched pro or had a need for server.

                • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  anyone who used NT4 and thought 2000pro was a bad drop is bonkers.

                  Also, I’m dubious of your experience because 2000 pro WAS window 2000. There was no ‘non pro’ - if you used windows 2000, every day you either saw it boot up saying windows 2000 Professional or Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2000 Advanced Server.

                  So you’re either misremembering, or kinda full of shit. Confusing it for Windows ME perhaps?

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2000

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              At some point I’d think you would have left windows behind for most daily tasks. I left around 20 years ago and haven’t had a problem at all.

              • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yeah, okay, so this was all just a “Omg just use Linux” type post.

                Not everyone can conveniently just ditch a major OS for something with less support. Like I said before, there is a reason everyone isn’t just jumping ship for Linux. People have plenty of legitimate reasons for it from work, to time commitment, to driver support, required software that doesn’t support it, etc.

                Good for you that you can switch and deal. Not everyone can. I’m not sure why so many Linux proponents are entirely fucking blind literally every possible reason that might keep someone off Linux and have to come fucking flying in on crusades on some fucking high horse of “Oooh, what peasants, of course everyone should just be switching to Linux!”

                Fuck off with your condescending bullshit.

        • pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I must admit, I really enjoyed fucking around in M$ Office 2003 (PowerPoint, FrontPage and more) as a kid — we made our own fictional “OS” Desktop Environments in PowerPoint, copying text boxes, drop-down menus etc. from FrontPage. It had a lot of new features that Office XP didn’t have, which made our projects much cooler. It was like the best of both worlds, since it had a somewhat classic UI but also added features we found interesting for our weird niche usecase. Since Office 2003, it’s only been getting worse, IMO.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I like LibreOffice, I used it it university, and before Libre I used openoffice and staroffice before that.

        BUT! Since working in an ms office reliant organization for more than 10 years, I’ve become addicted to ms office’s grammar checks and integration with onedrive/sharepoint. Version control is integrated, I don’t have to alt tab to a terminal to submit to svn/git, and we have comments and live collaboration.

        I sometimes wish that I could have working grammar check in other software than microsoft’s. Writing my final thesis in word, only to copy the sections into texniccenter for layout was tedious.

      • Octopus1348@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        OnlyOffice if you want an editor similar to Word. I switched to it also because LibreOffice’s UI bugged out and I didn’t see any buttons.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Thanks! I’m trying it out and see if it meets my meager needs for home use office type software. It seems lighter weight than LibreOffice.

        • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I like to think that LibreOffice is a great alternative to those used to 2003 and older MS Office, and OnlyOffice is a good alternative to those used to post-2003 MS Office.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        VBA automation backend

        That was in the first Word for Windows for 1989. The scripting built into word was later rebranded as VBA. I used it in 1990 to replicate the “Give me a Cookie” prank that was on Vax/VMS at the time.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like anytime I’ve ever taken a class to learn how to use Word, it’s been one of two things.

      First is essentially how we will use Word. It’s a note pad with a few extra things for editing text, but the main thing is headers, footers, and the margin sizes.

      Second is nothing I will ever use. When I was going to school for accounting I had to take a class on Windows programs, and we spent so much time learning how to post images, how to edit them, and shit like that. By the end of the class I could probably make a profesional looking flyer, but it would have taken half the time with any image editing type program.

      Also in that class we had a free students version of Word, which meant that there were usually steps in the homework we couldn’t do, but we still got points docked for it. Even though we all told the professor about this. So that was fun.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      AbiWord was always a good one. Their format was weird but it wasn’t limited to that.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Old word processors were designed to make sure to include features both the consumer and the professional (who would need things like markup tools, special margin widths, etc.) would need. Then professional printers moved on to better software, but Microsoft (and others) never removed those features and that turned into ‘how many features can we add’ until now Word is like some sort of shitty combination of a WordPad and PowerPoint. It’s so full of unnecessary features that have a one case in ten thousand uses.

      It’s not even just the word processors themselves. This has been going on for decades. Why are dingbats fonts packaged with computers? Because they were printers marks and Apple wanted printers to use their computers, so they added a font with printers marks and then Microsoft did the same with Windows and now we still have a font which is used mostly by kids fucking around because there are now better and easier ways to use the one or two characters in that font set that you will ever likely even think about using.

      The more OSes and software trim themselves of this fat, the better, but it goes the other direction most of the time.

  • k_rol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    I couldn’t care less. I never used it. Was either notepad++ or office. I’m pretty sure with all the telemetry they have, they knew no one really use it anymore and it’s not worth it.

      • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean Notepad++ is like a monument to Microsoft incompetence and them not caring about technically minded people for decades. Where a single guy beats trillion dollar company’s ass, actually not just beats, absolutely destroys big time. And they were either not able or didn’t care with responding and providing some power text editor. The fact that their OS was able to acquire any significant market share in developer’s community is an ultimate triumph of marketing department

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I thought WordPad was the best thing ever in 2001.

      Then I got Microsoft Word. Then Google Docs changed everything by making it free and haven’t even thought of WordPad since.

      I dunno something something LibreOffice before the Linux nerds beat me up.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not a Linux nerd, LibreOffice is what we use on our five windows computers because it’s free 🤷

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Wordpad was good for notes with wrapped text. However then I discovered Notepad++ and that’s the far better note taking application - you can even get plugins like a comparitor that compares two different files, as well as being an excellent application for typing and viewing code.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The only times I’ve ever opened wordpad was on new Windows installs when I hadn’t installed another word processor or hadn’t changed the default editor for RTF files.

        • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Not a dumb question! I wouldn’t be surprised if it does though I can’t say for sure it does. With how little development it’s gotten recently, I want to say no it doesn’t spy nearly as much because it likely hasn’t been updated with more spying, though. But I obviously don’t know for sure, they might have went in and added telemetry while changing little else UX or functionality wise.

          LibreOffice has its flaws but it’s functionally superior to Wordpad and (IMO, and this is probably an unpopular opinion) not far behind Microsoft Office, almost on par. It’s also open source and still gets regular updates. So if you’re looking for a privacy friendly alternative to Microsoft Office I’d suggest that and not risk it with Wordpad.

          Though, the Windows OS itself’s spying definitely swamps whatever spying Wordpad does or doesn’t have, so the point is kind of moot, you’re being spied on about the same with or without Wordpad, same applies to LibreOffice as it can’t do anything about Windows’s spying. I encourage everyone to at least try Linux as a dual boot or on a second computer if you already have one of those, even if you can’t fully migrate away from Windows for whatever reason.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Regular notepad is starting to get a LOT more features. I could see notepad essentially filling that void if they keep up the pace.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    RIP WordPad.

    I almost never used it (in fact, I only heard of it when its death was announced, striesand effect in action), but this is sad. It’s a bygone relic of when software was included with what you paid for, simple and efficient, and not marred by endless storage hungry updates that rarely add anything useful.

    There is no easy replacement.

    Of course, Microsoft wants you to use Word, which is expensive and runs at 0.05x the speed of WordPad.

    There’s notepad, but it’s far too basic.

    Notepad++ exists and is really good (I donated to it recently), but it targets a different kind of text editing, focused more on code than documents.

    LibreOffice is good for document editing, but it’s somewhat slow and clunky in a way WordPad is definitely not.

    The closest competitor may be Abiword but that already died years ago.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bounced around between LibreOffice and OpenOffice for years as I was too cheap to pay for Word. Mainly Libre.

      Finally broke down and paid for Office365 when I was struggling to display some (I believe) docx files at the same time my wife was requesting we get it for her work (and this doesn’t even get into struggling to get stuff to display properly for word uses which was constantly a problem).

      And man, is it lightyears better than libreoffice. And sure it’s slower, it does a ton more stuff, but if it feels slow to you. . .what kind of computer are you running? I use it on my 8 year old laptop all the time and have never really thought it felt slow.

      Wordpad I didn’t even realize still existed. Just looking at it now, I see why. I see very little I gain from NP++ (or I’ve even switched over to VSCode for a lot of things).

      I feel like you are making the case for why the only “easy” replacement costs money. The free versions are all extremely limited, or aren’t very good.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ll admit I exaggerated slightly (I just opened both today). I have a gaming laptop with a Ryzen 9 5900HX, and opened up both apps from battery power.

        WordPad took about 1.5s to open, which is longer than usual.

        Word took about 6s to open, which is normal even if I’m plugged in.

        LibreOffice would actually take more like 15s to open under these circumstances, which is why I said it’s slow. The clunky part is due to the UX.

        Even notepad took over a second to open as well.

        I guess I expect more when I have a near top of the line CPU and it pains me to think that it’s even slower for the vast majority of people.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess I’m just not too concerned with start up times, having come from the age of HDD. 6 seconds to start, as long as it’s not lagging while I’m using it, is almost unnoticeable.

          • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah that makes sense. I also have a high end SSD so that might also be inflating my expectations.

    • AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      LibreOffice is lots faster than Word, honestly you can say that about any peice of Microsoft software and its open source equivilant. LibreOffice also displays old document formats better too.

      Never used wordpad, honestly surprised to see how many people used it. Maybe someone will start a project to make a simple word processor to replace it.

      • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        From my experience Word runs faster and more smoothly than LibreOffice Writer.

        Everyone says Word is bloated, but gosh they’re picking the wrong Microsoft software to pick on. Pick on Teams instead. Word is clunky at times and slow but feature rich. Teams is horribly slow and laggy even on fast hardware.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is it being replaced with something else preinstalled? What the heck do I tell Windows-using coworkers to use when it doesn’t open a text documents automatically from clients??

    I’ve installed Libreoffice but Linux has spoilt me as Windows needs a damn reboot to use it properly. I can’t log back in (and one of the setups is also a damn server to the other) :/

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, Notepad is still there, and even with its simplicity and other issues (which have gotten a lot better), it’s always been way better for text files than WordPad

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Notepad could be fine sometimes but they often have images in the documents given from our clients (who are often equally not skilled with computers).

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am sure Microsoft will just keep nagging them to take an Office 365 subscription.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve installed Libreoffice but Linux has spoilt me as Windows needs a damn reboot to use it properly.

      You’re either exaggerating or it’s a problem with LibreOffice.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The main reason why I used WordPad was because ‘write’ is shorter than both ‘notepad’ and ‘msword’ in the run menu.

  • samokosik@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I honestly remember using this often because it could display .docx/.doc files in a nicer way than libre office. In addition, I never learned how to use word because the interface was too complicated.

    When I had to write sth, I used latex and when I needed to view/slightly edit .docx, I used this in a VM.