• WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Cat food isn’t even any more expensive than canned tuna and other similar canned meats. You’re not saving any money. You’re eating cat food for no reason!

    • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      My neighbor has an indoor cat that spends all day getting into the highest spots he can find. This is his hobby. I’ve watched him get down from on top of the high-hung cupboards and the way he did it… it was like the whole apartment was his planet fitness. They all called him fat, because at first glance, sure you could say that.

      He got down to come see me when I first visited and I was 100% sure that I never wanted to mess with this cat. It was like patting a fuzzy wall. He is not fat. Bro is built like a tank. He’s literally V shaped. He’s survived years with three pitbull dogs that like to chase him and try to use him as a toy. Out of all the animals there, that is the scariest one. That’s what happens when your cat uses ALL the protein in that food for gainz.

      I pointed this out to one of the neighbors and the look on their faces as they realized I was right.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And then there’s the other kind of cat (mine) that uses all the protein to become pear-shaped.

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ounce for ounce, this shit is wildly expensive. You could eat far cheaper and not be you know… eating fucking cat food.

        • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 minutes ago

          Yeah… that doesn’t seem like a reliable site. According to the FAQ the owner just reads the labels and assigns a rating based on their own undocumented scoring system. They also have no particular qualifications for the work they’re doing and make several clerical errors due to their own bias. For example, they don’t count anything listed only as “protein” as protein because they don’t trust the manufacturer not to lie on the label. Given that this site gets literally all of their information from the manufacturer’s label, I’m sure you see why that’s a problem. Their information is also just plain wrong on some accounts, such as labeling Royal Canin as “significantly lower carbs than average” while most experts agree the opposite is true. The reason they get these wrong is due to a flawed methodology. They basically add up the percentages on the labels and classify whatever is left however they want.

          For the record, I don’t feed my cat Royal Canin (due to the above reason), I was only commenting on the smell. Nevertheless, I would advise everyone to steer away from that site.

        • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          What exactly is this website? I’d never heard of it. It seems legit, but I’m curious about their sourcing.

          • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            It’s legit. Her only fault is the data is always slightly out of date because pet food manufacturers are always changing their recipes, which change the dry matter basis values and warnings about ingredients.

            It’s all explained on her about page, but basically she has painstakingly built up the database by sourcing everything herself and accepting some community input. I personally have emailed to have things updated.

            https://catfooddb.com/about

  • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fun fact, because of the great depression, canned pet food has to be safe for human consumption.

    Well, for now, at least

    • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 day ago

      I couldn’t find anything on the great depression requiring pet food to be safe for human consumption. I would love for someone to prove me wrong through.

      According to this PetMD article, prior to WW2 pet food was a luxury item. During WW2 pet food production completely stopped due to the war. (No cited sources on this article though, I am not sure how accurate it’s claims are?)

      According to this Vice article, pet food is held to some standards but technically does not need to be safe for human consumption. (Again, I am not sure how trustworthy of a source Vice is)

      This is the best source I have found, a peer reviewed and cited research article published on Jan 30th 2023: Insights-Driven Development of Humanized Foods for Pets. It clashes with the above article in that it talks about pet food production during WW2 and actually cites sources. In regards to pet food being required to be fit for human consumption, it doesn’t mention anything about the great depression. It actually mentions that this is a more recent development and that there still isn’t a “set standard”

      A seemingly simple yet confusing claim that has appeared recently in the pet food space is “human-grade,” whereby additional regulations regarding manufacturing, packaging, and storing of the food ensure compliance with safety standards of human consumption guidelines (Oba et al., 2020). Although this claim has been used for pet foods for a few years, it has no definition in animal feed regulations. The term “edible,” however, is defined by the US Department of Agriculture as foodstuffs that have been processed, inspected, and passed manufacturing regulations that are designed to ensure safety for consumption by humans. Pet foods that truly meet this standard must include only ingredients that are human edible and must be manufactured, packed, and held in accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 (AAFCO, 2021; FDA, 2022). Currently, AAFCO is in the process of drafting guidance for “human-grade” claims in pet foods in an attempt to provide clarity to the claim (AAFCO, 2021). The proposed definition outlines that pet foods using the “human-grade” claim are first and foremost animal food products that are subjected to inspection under 21 CFR 507, manufacturing must be in accordance with 21 CFR 110, and the overall process is conducted according to standards ensuring human consumption safety (Carter et al., 2014; Oba et al., 2020; FDA, 2022). Furthermore, the pet food bearing a “human-grade” claim must be manufactured in accordance with the applicable human food regulations for ready-to-eat human food (AAFCO, 2021, 2022)

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You complain about microplastics in our food.

        I am happy about the extra synthetic fiber intake.

        We are not the same.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pate of cow and chicken buttholes? No thanks, I prefer Soylent Green, just add cheese in a can!

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ordinary Sausage made a sausage out of cat food. Gave it 3.5/5; higher than quite a few made out of “regular” food. Make of that what you will.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I once made chicken liver pate for my cats, as a treat. It was only chicken liver pan-fried in a bit of lard, with a bit of salt. My cats flat out refused, but it turned out delicious so I froze it into cubes for myself, and ate it across the span of two weeks.

    I still prepare it often, albeit with a different recipe.