For as long as you can’t stand it
For as long as you can’t stand it
Exactly! which is why them courting a casino operator seems… odd
If they are trying to get gambling tourists to visit internationally… that would be a hard sell, the city isn’t known for its night life.
They’re looking for a casino operator to finish the building? In exchange for the profits?
Who exactly is the target customer base for casino? How much cash would they have?
Typically the attacks don’t take 10 hours… they take seconds, what takes time is getting the captured device a laboratory and the laboratory having time to look at it. So what will happen usually is the phone is put into a faraday bag, hooked up to a usb charger, and put on a shelf until the laboratory can get around to it.
Once the lab starts attacking the phone, it could take seconds as I said above, but some attacks are more involved requiring the phone to be disassembled and leads soldered onto the board. The restarting is about reducing the time the lab has before they can start and finish their attack
The same process applies to computers and laptops as well, there are lots of mouse jigglers for sale to prevent a screen saver from going on.
That photo does not prove they actually ate it. None of that food was touched in the photo. Nobody took a nibble. Nobody grabbed a french fry.
What everybody else said, plus availability.
If I need to leave for an emergency trip at 5:00 in the morning, and I wouldn’t print stuff out for immigration before then… I basically need to have a printer at home. To be always available
People are coming over for game night, I’ll just print out a bunch of character sheets… I didn’t have a printer I’d have to plan ahead.
Availability, provides optionality, provides convenience. Making life easier.
But, I’ll concede, when I had available access to 24/7 printers I didn’t buy my own. Only when I lost that access did I buy my own printer
You have been tricked, you have been conned - Both statements put people on the back foot.
It’s more persuasive to talk about what objectives and outcomes people want, and advocate for the best path to getting those outcomes. Jumping to a interpretive conclusion is the rhetorically going up hill, because you haven’t communicated and persuaded the other party to arrive at the conclusion organically.
If we want people to behave differently we would find more success by not starting with the premise they are brainwashed. That is my thesis.
I’m confused, you down vote me, meaning I didn’t contribute to the discussion to your standard, but you provided a thoughtful comment.
Hostility isn’t a great way to build dialog.
This is the only way.
If you can’t do this, buy clothes that is the same color as your cat hair. Camouflage
It’s difficult to persuade people to your lifestyle, and your point of view, if you’r starting position is that their brainwashed if they don’t agree with you.
Carpet in the bathroom? Bold choice
Ikea shelf instead of a rack, but I used metal shelves for better thermals!
Top to bottom:
Perhaps a soft kneepad that you wear would work for you
Irresponsible driver kills cyclist at xy intersection.
And you read the article and it’s a ambulance with it’s sirens on, going through a a green light that the cyclist was running.
The reason unbiased/factual headlines are preferred is because there can always be context we miss at the reporting time.
Every planet has a PLANET_wants group, that’s put into the landing pad of that planet.
There is a buffer on each planet requesting the _wants group next to the rockets.
There are two shuttles that go through the planets clockwise and counter clockwise. They both have all the planet _wants groups
So if a planet needs huge drillers, it gets set one time in the _wants group, and everything else just happens automatically.
The ability to share logistics groups across devices is a really good quality of life improvement
Yes! All motherboards should come with SFP+ ports now!