Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    When SteamOS releases on all devices people will say “I’ll switch when every peice of Windows software is compatible” or some other unreasonable and impossible accomplishment. Even if every peice of Windows software was compatible people would say “ill switch to Linux when it looks and functions identically to Windows”.

  • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 minutes ago

    Let me preface by saying I love everything Valve has done for Linux gaming and I’m fully aware that Linux wouldn’t be where it is now without Steam. With that said… I really don’t get the hype for SteamOS on other devices. I mean, it’s serviceable if all you do is gaming but it’s honestly one of the worst desktop experiences I’ve ever had (and I’ve used gnome had many): You need to go into desktop mode to do pretty much anything a regular computer should be able to do and, when you get back into Steam, it closes everything you opened while in desktop mode. This means you have to rely on hacky software to do things you would just be able to do if Steam was better integrated with the desktop. For example, why do I need to install a plug-in to import all of my games from different stores into Steam when I should just be able to alt-tab into whatever launcher I want? No, I will not import other launchers into Steam’s launcher and then launch the launcher from the Steam launcher to launch the game — I’m not a crazy person. It feels as if Steam is doing everything in its power to keep me from leaving it and punishes me for daring to try, which honestly reminds me of a certain fruit company. Now, Valve obviously designed SteamOS to be used with a controller and only for games bought from Steam (which is delusional but I digress), so let’s assume you are that person: you have your entire game library on Steam and you use a controller as your main input device so you don’t see the need to ever leave Valve’s walled garden. Then you’d still be better off with any one of the other 37 thousand distros that come with Steam preinstalled because then you at least have access to the desktop Steam UI.

    tl; dr: SteamOS kinda sucks, just use a normal distro. Yes, even if you exclusively buy games from Steam.

  • Cheems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I recently switched to fedora and I didn’t think it would be difficult, but it was even easier than I expected. Every game I’ve tried to play has worked perfectly.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    48 minutes ago

    To anyone reading this thinking “once SteamOS comes out, I’ll switch”, you should know:

    Gaming on Linux is already here. Pick a distro and game. You can take advantage of Proton right now. You don’t need to wait for one specific distro.

    I’ve personally been gaming on Linux exclusively for about 3 years. Windows games, not Linux games.

    Edit: based on other commenters’ suggestions, I’ll give you some.

    I have gamed for those three years on PopOS. It is a distro based on Debian, ultimately, which means it’s also related to Ubuntu and Mint. Realistically, you can pick any of those 4 and you should have a nice experience.

    Arch is popular with the übergeeks, and I do use it on my laptop, BTW, but you shouldn’t use it as a first distro.

    The concept of “distro” doesn’t really exist for Windows, because you pretty much get one monolithic product. But basically, it is a specific mix of software that works together and relies on the Linux kernel. Imagine it as a “version” of Windows with specific goals, some of which are overlapping (e.g. Mint and Ubuntu tend to cater to the same audience).

    If you get far enough into it, the freedom that Linux allows means that you can turn any distro into any other distro.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Tbh the vast majority of people who say “ill switch to (insert Linux distro here) when (insert accomplishment here)” will most likley never switch

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Fair enough. I tend to agree, but I like to give people the benefit of the doubt, because, you know, FOSS and freedom.

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It’s actually surprising how easy it is to use.

      My wife was playing Baldur’s Gate 3 on her windows laptop (GOG version, DRM free) and I just wanted to see if I can run it on my Linux laptop.

      Just copied the game folder from her laptop to my external SSD, plugged it into my laptop, ran through proton. Everything works without any issues. Simple as that.

      I was pleasantly surprised. We could even join via LAN and had some co-op fun. After trying it out I think I’m buying the game.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        37 minutes ago

        This is fair. I should have given my own suggestions.

        Mint is probably the choice at the moment for new folks. Also, this will be controversial, but feel free with Ubuntu. It will get you started, and that’s great.

        Edit: I added some (open-ended) suggestions to my original comment.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think that is perfectly valid and I’ll happily recommend steamos to newcomers. I’m only a little worried about it being locked to flatpaks by default though. Hopefully that will change, but for most users it will be a good start.

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For all the not super technically inclined people out there, I would recommend Linux mint with cinnamon, you’ll feel right at home and won’t face any real issues so long as you don’t want to play LoL, a few other big multiplayer games have anti cheat systems that don’t like Linux.

    • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ll switch when 10 finally dies, they state Oct 2025 but if even less people go to 11 they won’t really have a choice but to keep 10 up and running. Make 10 the last Windows OS ever. Never go to 11.

    • haulyard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Sons is mostly playing Valorant right now on Windows 11. I’m an old dude familiar with FreeBSD, and Debian. No clue about running games and stuff though. Would he be able to switch?

      edit: thanks for the insight. Sounds like a no-go for now until anti-cheat stuff is supported outside windows.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        Yes, anti-cheat specifically is a problem. That’s you fighting against the corpos, to be clear. Not really an issue with gaming on Linux itself.

        Edit: not only against the corpos, but more generally against the idea of “kernel-level anti-cheat”. If you’re giving any corporation kernel-level access to your machine, you basically no longer control your machine. That’s true of Windows too.

        It’s a big issue and the lack of support on Linux is a bit of a feature, not really a bug.

      • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Some Linux Competitive Multiplayer games that generally “just work” and perform well under Linux: Insurgency Sandstorm, Hunt Showdown, Hell Let Loose, Dead by Daylight, Battlebit

      • lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        To be 100% honest, probably not, and you may need to confirm with someone who knows Valorant. The big issue is anti-cheat, the detectors in use for major multiplayer games tend to lose their minds when they see Linux as they’re typically only built for Windows. Other than anti-cheat, it wouldn’t surprise me if it played better on Linux. Some of the low level magic has improved a lot in recent years, but official support is mandatory for multiplayer.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s the only category of games that doesn’t work, they use kernel windows modules for anti-cheat and they don’t have any plans to support

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A Linux distro with a great OOTB experience for gamers would go a long way.

    • Steam pre-installed
    • trustworthy Flatpak packages for popular gamer apps like Discord (not uploaded by some nameless rando)
      • TeamSpeak for curmudgeons like me and my friends
    • desktop environment tailored to Windows users
    • auto-install and configure graphics drivers for AMD and Nvidia
    • configurable automatic updates and system backup
    • choice between Chromium, Firefox, etc. for default browser during setup
    • included in Steam Deck compatibility testing
      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Bazzite is fantastic and it’s what I’m running on my gaming laptop, but I’ve always wondered why you would want to put it on a Steam Deck? Is it for the people who use it as a laptop replacement?

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As I understand it, there have been issues with distributing Nvidia drivers in a Linux distro. Some do do it, but it’s kind of a legal grey area due to potential conflicts with the license of the Linux kernel.

      I don’t really understand it fully, but it’s been an issue for a while. Apparently it’s less of an issue now because Nvidia partially open sourced its drivers. AMD’s GPU drivers apparently don’t have these issues.

      Wonder what the situation with intel’s new GPUs and its drivers is.

    • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      5 hours ago

      IMO, no one should be playing games with kernel level anticheat. There is no way I would let any big gaming company have that level of control over my PC. It’s a security nightmare.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        sadly theres a line between shouldn’t and how the market responds to it. Regardless of the fact, it is a hurdle, and the reason why not all of the top games on the concurrent player list on steam is playable on SteamOS, whether one likes it or not.

      • plant_based_monero@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If gamers were buying in their best interest nintendo would be bankrupt, there is what gamers should do and there is the real world. The sad reality is that only the low end gamers care about vanguard and they aren’t paying the bills in riot

      • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I wonder if Valve will eventually offer their own system of checks similar to Google Play Integrity? I don’t think I’d care for it since it’s an invasion of personal choice on a device that you own, but for people who want to play competitive games with cheating problems, running a partition with integrity checking seems a fair trade.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah you can do most of that server side but they don’t want to pay for it. Why pay when your players let you coop their machine for free or even better yet pay you for the privilege. Also player run dedicated servers would fix all of this. Don’t like the cheaters movement servers. Own the server ban them. We had this working just fine in the 90s.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Or getting players & friends to stop playing those types of games when there are so many compatible games to choose from.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That will be more likely as more people start using SteamOS.
      If SteamOS can get enough users, then not supporting it will start to hurt the game developers profits.

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It does often feel like as soon as a significant hurdle is overcome, the industry just makes another one.

      Hopefully SteamOS/Steam on Linux gets enough traction to force publishers to reconsider.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And with every step it’s getting better. 10 years ago almost no games were natively supported and you needed to fuck around a lot to start anything with wine and most didn’t work anyway. Nowadays everything just works, and the only category of games that doesn’t is that slop with kernel level anticheat.
        The improvement was monumental.

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In my case it’s a sign I might should try out PC gaming again. I’ve been console exclusively for like 15 years now because so few games used to work. But with Steamdeck’s popularity we might actually start seeing more than 10% of games getting native ports 🤞

    • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At this point we don’t even need native ports. Developers can just make a windows version and we can play it with proton

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        Having more developers natively release for Linux implies removing influence from Windows and making more people realize it is a viable option for daily computer use.

        It’s not just about gaming at this point, it’s about changing an entire paradigm and erode monopolies.

        Can you imagine a Linux “monopoly” on personal computers? The dumb discussions about using Arch, Fedora, Debian or Suse? It would only be hot air escaping mouths because under the hood every development on one side is feeding improvement into the entire ecosystem.

  • videogame [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Just in time for Windows 10 to lose support in October 2025 and for me to never switch to Windows 11 because it sucks and I hate it

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Every so often they’ll release an update that breaks everything, or they’ll patch something and the processor improvements will be bigger than intel or amd get out of a generation, showing how gimped it was to begin with.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I don’t understand this tbh. It’s here already. SteamOS will likely be just like the deck - immutable arch running the existing steam package.

    You can totally do this today and it works great. Don’t want to mess with arch and that confusing command line? Use something easier like mint and install the flatpak - then you don’t even have to futz with nvidia drivers. Or use bazzite?

    What does steamOS offer that we don’t already have? (Serious question)

    • muelltonne@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      A few things:

      1. It gives manufacturers a blueprint for their devices. You will see a lot of handhelds running SteamOS from different manufacturers. You will also see a lot of small “gaming boxes” with SteamOS to plug in your TV. That’s great!
      2. Game Developers will have one distribution to test their games on. One of the bigger problems linux had before SteamOS was the big clusterfuck of different distros. Great for users, but a big headache if you’re developing for it. Now you can say “it runs on SteamOS”, test on SteamOS and you don’t have to deal with bug reports from people running RedStarOS
      3. It’s Valve. It’s a company. They are the biggest store selling games and they are building their moat to protect themselves against Microsoft, Apple, Epic & Co. That not exactly great for users, but also explains why Valve is doing this linux push. To prevent Microsoft from abusing their Windows monopoly to crush them
    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think it’s mostly a matter of having it preinstalled.

      The perception is that if it’s pre installed, then it is designed for the device.

    • Mactan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      these people need permission from a massive corporation calling it something other than Linux so they can dodge the cognitive dissonance of hating Linux

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Or rather, there’s someone who isn’t going away anytime soon and someone who you can go to if their shit screws up, someone with an actual address and support number, and it’s not just a Github issue tracker page that hasn’t been seen by the owner in months.

        Some people want that peace of mind. Some people aren’t built to scour the internet for hours to maybe find solutions to their problems.

        • Mactan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          …do people really do that with Microsoft, or do they just throw the errant device in a closet and get a new one at best buy?

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    PC gamers moving to console? What’s next the existing consoles adopting keyboard+mouse?..

    There is no downside to this

    • Consoles have accepted keyboard+mouse for years now! Microsoft started with the Xbox one and Sony started with the PS3; Though there were select games for generations prior that supported k+m through their own implentations