In other words, it’s fine to defend vigilantes when they kill unarmed Black people or anti-racist activists, but when a CEO’s life is taken, we must solemnly stay silent on the reasons why such a person might be targeted or why bystanders might not be crying.
I’m so tired of seeing this ugly bastard.
unfortunately being an asshole is a pre-existing condition and as such cannot be covered at this time.
My sympathy deductible hasn’t been reached, darn!
Why would I have sympathy for a mass murderer? The man is burning in the Pit of Hell right now.
Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin - An Accounting of the Victims of Brian Robert Thompson.
You guys aren’t reacting to the way we want you to react!! Stop it now!
Thoughts and prayers :
- I think it should happen more often.
- I pray it does (instead of school shootings, let’s say).
Thank you for calling sympathy customer service. Your call is important to us, a representative will be with you shortly.
We are currently experiencing unprecedented call volume at this time. Please wait for the next available representative.
the worst music ever at the highest volume possible starts playing
Sympathy? Hmm . . . let’s see . . . sympathy . . ok. I’m sorry he didn’t contract a really ferocious strain of ass-cancer that his insurance didn’t cover.
That costs money.
Also: no.
i don’t cover that - sorry!
Billionaires deserve to live in fear for their lives.
I would like to know how we can all do more to bring this about.
Advocate for their killing, far and wide. Eventually someone without anything to lose will get the job done
Or we all end up patriot acted away into oblivion.
I get what you’re saying and I’m all for it, but I also wonder if there is a more sneaky way to achieve the same end result.
Maybe we need to democratize Adjustor targets. Start a worldwide coalition with some sort of anonymous forum and voting system.
Dark web crowdsourced CEO bounty hunting?
Now we’re delving into the cyberpunk world I can get behind.
Or not.
Live, that is.
*Oligarchs.
Find me one ethical billionaire
The ones that donated all their money away (while living) so that they would no longer be billionaires, would be as close as you could get.
proving the only good billionaire is a dead billionaire.
Behind every great fortune is a great crime
All we could do for pity is to throw a fire extinguisher into his grave. Where he is, he will need it.
Sorry, fire extinguishers are wasted on dragons.
Brian Robert Thompson murdered 51,000 innocent human beings.
Please cite a source. It’s gotta be much higher than that.
It is a reasonable first order estimate. See a comment here. I think I will organize this a bit better and make a blog post on this tomorrow. But suffice to say, 51,000 is a good baseline number, based on UHC’s share of the private insurance market and the length of Thompson’s tenure as CEO of UHC. It could be as high as 100,000. But really, at this scale, it ceases to matter. You can only really comprehend it in comparative terms. And his number of victims was order of magnitude greater than that of Osama Bin Ladin.
Osama bin Laden was a chump compared to these guys. Osama was already wanted by the US for a crime he did in 1993 and had his Saudi citizenship revoked and he was a stateless runaway doomed to live in hiding and squalor no matter what.
He wasn’t even the mastermind behind 9/11. Hell, he even had a hard time controlling Mohammad Atta, the ringleader of the hijackers, who wanted the operation to be more about him and his final end more than anything else.
Not OP, but it’s going to be really hard to assign a hard value to that. There are plenty of obvious examples where they denied a life-saving treatment. But many of them would’ve died anyway.
Then there are cases where they deny preventative/early treatments. Some of these eventually led to more serious and fatal conditions, some did not. How do we count these?
Then there’s quality of life denials. These don’t directly lead to fatal conditions, but can affect morale and the like, thus allowing more serious conditions?
All of it would be compared to the unexplored alternatives (where treatment was authorized). This is inherently an unknown.
I’m not defending him by any means. It’s just that his body count is, at best, a rough estimate.
Whether they would have died anyway isn’t a measure of whether it is ethical to deny someone care that was the only chance they had. Removing the possibility is still murder.
I’m no math wizard but I’ve read 68k people die per year from preventable shit due to denied claims. Brian worked at United since 2004, CEO since 2021 so he contributed directly or indirectly to that number of deaths per year, at least the portion United is responsible for. United has double the industry average of rejected claims.
It’s def higher than OP states.
The 51k estimate was just taking into account the time that he was CEO.
Message control.
This is why they bought the media in the first place, so what they say is loudest.
it’s happening on here too. I’ve had numerous people argue that his death changed nothing.
bots must be cheap.
