• ambitious_bones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    13 days ago

    For anyone else wondering:

    “The artwork owner is given a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Cattelan as well as instructions about how to replace the fruit when it goes bad.”

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 days ago

        Bingo, that’s the point. It’s a statement on the value of art. At the end of the day, a painting is just a piece of linen with shit smeared all over it. You might as well just tape a banana to the wall and be done with it. But it also shows something else - art isn’t just paint smeared canvas. It has meaning behind it and it evokes emotion.

        So this guy eating it and pissing off 90% of people does the best thing that he could have done. Also, the remaining 10% know that it is not about the banana on the wall which was replacable. It was about the emotions - the outrage, the trolling. It is the same artwork - since art isn’t just paint / just a banana.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          This is something I’ve never really stopped to think about until now, but this artwork is actually a piece of genius.

          It’s an idea, or a concept, expressed in the form of a banana taped to a wall. It cannot be destroyed, or duplicated. You can tape a banana to a wall, but there can be only one banana taped to a wall. You can destroy the banana, the tape, or even the wall, and the artwork remains, because you cannot destroy an idea. In fact, someone already has eaten the banana.

          Furthermore, everyone talking about it merely increases the value of the piece.

          It’s absolutely genius.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Anyone who says the rich deserve to BE rich because they are “clever businessmen” need to repeatedly kicked in the balls.

    Most folks could live comfortably for the rest of their lives on what this idiot spent on a banana.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      Moderate investing of $6.2 million with a 4-6% return would amount to a monthly payout of $25,833/month. Very comfortably.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        Which is why it’s really weird for people to be so greedy after they’ve already accomplished five million.

      • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        25,833 USD a month will result in the ultimate comfortable lifestyle. A big house, car, 100% Healthcare. Everything you could possibly need and a loy more.

      • Blass Rose@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        And here I am glad that my savings account interest pays for my phone bill+90% of my car bill. Meanwhile I could just be buying a new car every month, instead, with a small loan of $6M

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is a special keystone headline used to warn time travellers to keep on driving to the next timeline, this one is cooked, attempt no landing here

  • Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ll never understand spending that money like that instead of helping kids with cancer.

    Probably one of the several reasons why I am not rich.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      13 days ago

      You know spending money doesn’t make it vanish into the air right? Someone else has the 6.2 million, and it can still help kids with cancer.

      • Modva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I never thought I’d ever see someone argue against helping kids with cancer DIRECTLY when we have excess in the palm our hands, and yet here we are.

        • C126@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          You’re mad at the wrong person. He only has a banana. The banana “artist” has $6.2 million now. Why aren’t they helping kids with cancer? I suggest you go yell at them.

          • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            13 days ago

            Do you think someone spends $6.2 million on fruit if they don’t have an extra few million? He had $6.2 million at MINIMUM, and he chose to eat a banana instead of healing children.

            I think it’s perfectly fair to be mad at a person for the actions they took.

            • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 days ago

              He had $6.2 million at MINIMUM

              According to this great reporting by Protos, he holds over $580,000,000 in just Bitcoin, with tens (and sometimes hundreds) of millions in other assets, like TRON (the coin you can see promoted on the side of his microphone in the article’s photo) which is a clone of the Ethereum blockchain he made by simply copying the code, artificially lowering fees, then publishing it as if he created it.

              Not only is he a rich douchebag, but he’s also a plagiarist.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Some gifter who managed to convince the world that a banana was worth 6.2 million dollars has that money. They won’t be helping anyone but themselves.

        I hope crypto-bro stole that 6.2 million from a cartel, and his next video involves people with machetes showing him how they feel about it.

        • Decoy321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          It’s even worse than that. The banana isn’t the actual thing valued at that price. It’s the exhibit, an abstract arbitrary concept. The banana and duct tape get replaced periodically. This person is just eating a banana for the attention.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Same argument about wasting 44 billion to buy twitter.

        A useless website exchanged hands.

        Someone still has the money, why dont they spend it on the poor?

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    surely the banana is rotten by now wasn’t this years ago yup he just replaced the banana so he just ate… a banana, which he could’ve done with every previous banana that went rotten too if he doesn’t mind soft bananas

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Idk it seems par for the course

      The 34-year-old crypto businessman was last year charged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission with fraud and securities law violation in relation to his crypto project Tron.

  • GeekMan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    There’s never been a better time to reference Arrested Development;

    “There’s ALWAYS, money, in the Banana Stand”

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    NFT artists kind of hide behind the oldschool art world to justify it…

    I think it shows how stupid that world is.

    The point of art is to move people, to make them think and feel something by conveying the artist’s thoughts, not be a store of value. And while I’ve been to museums with gorgeous pieces, if you’re paying millions for a painting, at some point most of that value is the gratification of hoarding it. That same money could buy you an incredible experience in today’s art landscape, but it’s not about the experience, is it? And NFTs are like the perfect deconstruction of that.

    That being said, OP I am downvoting your post because eyeballs are exactly what crypto bros want, no offense :P