• november@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mark Richard Shuttleworth (born 18 September 1973) is a South African and British entrepreneur who is the founder and CEO of Canonical, the company behind the development of the Linux-based Ubuntu operating system.[1] In 2002, Shuttleworth became the first South African to travel to space, doing so as a space tourist.[2][3][4] He lives on the Isle of Man and holds dual citizenship from South Africa and the United Kingdom.[5][6] According to the Sunday Times Rich List in 2020, Shuttleworth is worth an estimated £500 million. –Wikipedia

      This explains so much.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I remember. And how much shit the community flung towards them. And their rep is still stained with it, as it should be.

  • Jayb151@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh wait, they removed that? I had no idea because I stopped using Ubuntu when they put ads in the dash.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Doesn’t mean they stopped pushing their own shit in places that they have no business touching. I mean:

      > apt install firefox
      > look inside
      > snap

      And then there’s Ubuntu Pro. https://feddit.org/comment/2001630

      (edit) I just realized that I could’ve expressed the first point using proper English, but my idiot brain immediately chose memes. I think I’m beyond help.

      • whitecold@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I will never understand why that 2 lines in the terminal bother anyone. It’s a free service. Free as in free beer. If you use the terminal, you are tech-savvy enough to disable it, if you don’t use the terminal, you’ll not see it anywhere, at all.

        While we are at it, they advertise all of their products like that in the terminal, not just Ubuntu pro. Landscape and microk8s both appear like that on an ssh login.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’re planning on making a version where everything is a snap. Performance and usability may come later, who knows.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think it’s an interesting approach. I much prefer flatpak but can’t say I’m curious what all-snap system would be like

        • whitecold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s already a thing? It’s called Ubuntu Core and is aimed at servers for now.

          They are working on a desktop edition which is what you are probably referring to - it’s a very interesting idea imho, they basically containerize the whole system, kernel and DE included. Will see how popular or useful it’ll be, but I can imagine it being used in embedded devices for example. In my understanding it’s going to be like most immutable distros, but with snaps instead of flatpaks.

  • IsoSpandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 months ago

    That was the first time I tried Linux with the free and open thing. I didn’t know much back then and when I saw the ads, I was like… Ooohhh this is ad supported crap. Nope… Not at all

    Fucking distro kept me away from my spirit penguin for 2 years before I realized it was ubuntu’s fault.

  • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    They were heavily panned for that back then. My image of Ubuntu of that time is heavily associated with their Unity desktop which they latter dropped(only for it to spring up again).

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I was using Debian on desktop for a while. I’ve been using Debian on servers for over 20 years so I figured it’s a good choice. I liked it, but ended up switching to Fedora. The only Linux distro I can use at work is Fedora (we use a modified version of Fedora) and I liked it enough to start using it at home too.

        I appreciate the newer packages, especially for things like KDE Plasma and the Nvidia drivers. For example, Fedora had KDE Plasma 6.1 before Debian had even started packaging 6.0 for experimental.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s also the stop I disembarked that train for desktops. I don’t know why I continued using them for some servers but their behavior with Snaps has me leaving for good.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Exactly why I avoided ubuntu (and ubuntu bases) for soo long I used it in a vm yes but i bearly did anything the ubuntu bases was not that bad but every distro was based on ubuntu except for arch,fedora etc and that’s why I chose fedora instead of popos now I just use arch base bcs I kinda don’t like how fedora only includes open source software

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Huh, I was using Ubuntu as my daily driver circa 2014 and I don’t remember this at all… maybe I stopped just prior to them implementing it… or maybe it just didn’t make enough of an impression for me to notice.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, and I don’t consider that an “easy to disable” option for regular users, but that’s just my opinion.

            “Easy to disable” is also the wrong approach, IMO. It should have been “easy to enable” - stuff like this should always be opt-in, not opt-out. Opt-out, to me, demonstrates a company’s motivations more than anything else.

              • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Yup, debian is where I was before Ubuntu, and where I went back to. Still what I run mostly, plus a few different flavors of it (proxmox for example).

                Though I’m also running an arch desktop on one of my play machines, kind of reminds me of having to write my x conf out in the 90s! Not bad overall.

                (Never giving up my deb stable servers though!)

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It could have been earlier? i tried Ubuntu around 2012. I didn’t know how to get rid of the Amazon stuff, and it turned me off Linux…thinking why use this OS that is ad based…wasn’t till 2017 when W10 made our computers slow that I tried linux again.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    This may be kind of a dumb question, but would it affect Mint in any way if Canonical were to reintroduce ads? I know Mint’s a fork but I’m not sure how integrated that part of the OS is.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Probably not as the Mint Team would either not be affected or they would have a cow.

      When snap came out the Mint team got pissed and started maintaining the packages removed from Ubuntu

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      It wouldn’t be worse than snap integration which Mint already doesn’t use. Also Mint have a backup plan called LMDE if things go sour.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I always got this feeling that LMDE will eventually become Mint’s main distro, with the Ubuntu-based version slowly fading away.

  • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I missed all the fun because there was no ads in my country, and the Amazon app was just a weird western thing removed right away. Unity was pretty good though.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hopefully you’ve tried another distro by now, and also know to avoid big corporate distros best you can

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I was digging LMDE until my 8GB of ram simply couldn’t handle the load and I’m in AntiX now. Honestly, I’ve watched Mint go from being immature and insecure to security leaders without losing their accessibility. Solid and incredibly important distro if you ask me

            • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I quit, told him to go fuck himself, that we see who he really is and to delete my account after he started banning journalists who dared to criticize the “free speech absolutionist” dickhead.