• NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    cool out the paperwork. if the ATF says your good you can have the gun. otherwise you’ll have to settle for most of the ammo

  • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    I enjoy posts like this where Americans get hooked into the legalities of what guns can be bought, the ammo, whether it’s permitted in some states, etc.

    It’s a movie about a robot from the future which time travelled. And people are questioning the legalities of buying guns in the 80’s.

    • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      And also the answer is easy, yes. Then, now, tomorrow, yes you can just buy any gun anywhere you want at any time. To be clear, I am American. Living in Amerikkka. Before posting this I went into my local Starbucks and bought a mortar launcher and a semi automatic pistol. After that I went over to fed ex and printed 3 luigi pistols in 4 different colors.

      Could you just imagine the suppression people face in other countries? Calling them colours or whatever it is in the metic system.

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Question about the pistol here, is the mount reliable enough to keep it zero’d and accurate? That’s a huge pistol and the kickback on the slide would be nuts, lots of energy moving around there to knock something loose, or at least a little off center, I feel like.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      Modern day, sure no problem. Today’s micro red dots can be mounted to the moving slides themselves and survive.

      In the 1980s? Maaaybe…

      The laser in the movie is mounted to the frame by way of the grip, so it will shake around much less than if it were on the slide. Mounting optics to the frame is how competition guns were (and sometimes still are) set up.

      The question comes down to the durability of a laser device made in the 80s. The movie’s laser was a specially made prop. On one hand it was made by the precursor to Surefire which is known for quality equipment, on the other hand I doubt the movie cared about it actually holding a zero.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well, he did come from the future after all. It wouldn’t be hard for Skynet to dig through criminal records, court cases, sales records, bank info, etc… and pinpoint where to get an optimal shopping experience for this mission.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Part of the plot was that Skynet didn’t have great records. The terminator had to use a phone book and go down the line killing Sarah Conners because it didn’t know which one was the target

  • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I mean the accent isn’t really relevant (though it would probably get a comment) but the large quantity of guns and ammo would raise suspicion.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      American Police: “Want to buy some guns? Go right ahead.”

      Also American Police: “Withdrawing more than $10,000 in cash to pay for it? Get’m boys!”

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      the large quantity of guns and ammo would raise suspicion.

      iirc there a law where more than 1,000 rounds in one purchase would have a federal note that someone bought a lot of ammo, so people just started buying 999 bullets instead lmao

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        yeah, and I should have been clearer that I more meant the gun part. buying a lot of guns isn’t that concerning, but buying a bunch at once is.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He also asks for an “Uzi 9mm” a full-auto machine gun, which you could NOT just buy over the counter at a retail gun store.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There was a ban on selling machine guns to civilians that was passed in 1986.

      The original Terminator film came out in 1984. So now? Yes, but then?

      Probably accurate.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not entirely. Machineguns have, since 1934, been required to be registered with the federal government, and for a normal person individually require a federal approval to buy (a “stamp”).

        What happened in 1986 was the machinegun registry changed from open to closed. This means, that new machineguns are no longer added to the registry, meaning that for the average person (ie not somebody involved in the industry with their own special licensing) the number of machineguns for sale is limited and supply over time will always be going slowly down.

        The process for buying a machinegun is as simple as buying any other NFA item like a silencer/suppressor or an SBR. The cost has skyrocketed thanks to limited supply.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        The above point was you don’t just buy them over the counter in a one step, walk in transaction. The precise model doesn’t matter.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      In 1984, a full auto would still have been on an NFA registry. Open, rather than closed like today, but still not a simple one step sale.

      This is of course, fact checking the finer points of gun law in a movie about a time traveling robot.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      If you find a one in a million firearms store who buys their own stock and resells out back illegally, it still is.

      Also some pawn shops, technically anything made before a certain date is an Antique and skips a lot of regulations.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You know the revolvers cowboys are famous for using are all pre-1898 and more than good guns, yeah? Assuming they’ve been maintained properly, that is

          Even the black powder stuff is still going to be really damn good for most peoples uses (accuracy at short to medium range is just fine), I wouldn’t assume just because it’s older or powder that it’s not a good gun

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “Hey wait a minute. Those haven’t been invented yet. What are you? Some kind of time traveling killer robot with incomplete historical records. Hang on just one second pal, I gotta go to the back.”

  • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    lol no. Maybe in the past but now there’s a background check and often a mandatory waiting period before you can just walk out with a gun.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In fairness you could probably just walk out with it if you do what Arnie does in the movie…

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    No. That wouldn’t happen in a gun store.

    You’d have to go to a gun show.

    Edit: a gun show is like comic con, only for guns.

    • Metz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I mean Terminator 1 takes place in 1984. As far a quick search goes, there were no background checks, no assault weapon ban, no waiting period, …etc

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Background checks started in '68, they didn’t become instant until like '93 because internet but they still existed, I think it was by phone back then. The rest of that isn’t around now either except for some states, the national AWB expired 21yr ago, and there’s never been national waiting periods.

        • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Background checks started in '68, they didn’t become instant until like '93 because internet but they still existed

          They may have existed and some states imposed them but they weren’t required federally until the Brady bill in '93 .

          there’s never been national waiting periods.

          There was a 5 day waiting period required nationally between when the Brady bill was first enacted in '93 and when the national instant criminal background check system came online in '98

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Huh no shit TIL about that waiting period, thanks! I can’t look it up until later (at work, can fire off a message but not do research y’know) but would you happen to know how long it lasted?

            Though the questionnaires in the 60s were largely ineffective and took time, unless I am mistaken they were stored by the FBI until the ATF started existing in the early 70s, but yes “NICs” wasn’t until “I” was possible as I mentioned.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Private sales are private sales. Has nothing to do with gun shows, that shit is just ignorance from anti-2a groups/people. The pro2a people have been asking for access to the NICS for years. Even if we had to pay $10 for a BG check to come back as clear or not, but they don’t want that because it takes away from their wedge issue.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s required in Illinois to use a private seller portal for private sales through the state police site. It does some kind of check and it’s free to use.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        even as a foreigner, it is clear to me that gun-wary Americans tend not to be anti-2a, but want background checks and gun limits. Maybe politicians fit your narrative, especially Democrats, but if you are talking about citizens you are likely straw-manning.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The point is that private sellers have been asking to access NICS (the background check system) but politicians, who are in charge of giving that access through laws, have not allowed it. It is not “strawmanning” to be talking about the people with the actual ability to provide the access.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        but they don’t want that because it takes away from their wedge issue.

        Who is “they” in this case?

            • stringere@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yes, both sides require wedge issues to perpetuate a two party system in which neither has to enact the will of the people if they can campaign on divisive issues that effectovely change nothing.

              I did not say both parties were the same.

              Republicans are actively marching towards oligarchy, autocracy, and evil.

              Democrats have shown they are too cowardly to rock the boat and fight back. As the opposition party they have shown their true colors: ameaningless foil beholden to the same wealthy donor class as those they purport to oppose.

            • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              As the “other” side crushes leftist movement and worker power, provides no real resistance to the right wing (that they’re totally not a part of at all). They smush leftist politicians from joining the DNC and stymie and primary out leftist members already within the DNC in favor of moving to the right/moderate members. then one of their premier members says things like how “America needs a strong republican party”

              Yo we’re all like: “when will you get it”?? it’s 2025 alright and ya still don’t see, even tho they keep showing ya.

              Now if you’re not ready to put down the happy fantasy you grew up with, that beautiful dream that the world will be fixed without your personal effort and sacrifice, cool. It’s a scary prospect.

              In the meantime, stop shouting down the people who have made the step? It’s a tough enough ask already without the endless whining and disbelief at how much the truth sucks by those like you who haven’t accepted it yet.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Liberal bickering is morally equivalent to fucking Nazis, says someone who cannot figure out why their message won’t catch on.

                • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  “My” message is catching on without my help, since its, yaknow, true.

                  More importantly, you misunderstand my purpose in speaking to you. Your personal understanding of my “message” is not required. Folks like you, folks who figured they learned enough about politics and history in highschool, will believe whatever theyre told if it’s someone they trust. You’ll come around when and if “my” message becomes common sense. Only then. And you will at that time claim to have always known what I’m telling you, right now.

    • iowagneiss@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Except Comic Con is rare, and they don’t have to take down their “gun show this weekend!” signs here in Iowa because that’s every weekend, or so it seems.

      Agreed though. I was actually worried about what maga might do if Harris won, so I made my first purchases before the election. I had to provide ID, enter some personal identifiers into a website and be approved by a federal agency. It took an extra 30 minutes or so.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I live next to fairgrounds. Every Saturday: Gun and Knife Show.

        But I also remember working at a marina and where I saw far more transactions take place between two parked vehicles than anything that requires paperwork.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Total fiction. Everyone knows you have to go to a unlicensed seller at a gun show in the majority of states for that, not a gun store

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      unlicensed seller at a gun show

      Says people who have never been to a gun show. Find me ONE table that’s unlicensed.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’m sure there are plenty.

        The finer detail though is that any FFL with a table still has to run a NICS background check. While any non-FFL doesn’t (and to my knowledge can’t even if they wanted to), which is exactly the same as if they were selling privately in any other way.

        So, it is true you can buy a gun without a background check at a gun show, but it’s not like it’s a special law free zone where FFLs suddenly are exempt from the rules. It’s a unique situation where businesses and private sellers are selling guns right next to each other, each following different legal requirements.

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        There’s one gun show near me that allows private sellers to register for a table. The only time I’ve ever seen it is people in a historic items collectors club that show up, and I’ve only ever seen one with a gun to sell that was in working order and manufactured post-1899. He wanted $5,000 for a beat up m1917 Enfield. I don’t know whether he was stupid, or looking for someone else who was.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Tbf, some states allow private sellers at gun shows, some don’t, some shows in states that do allow it won’t allow it themselves, etc. It’s kinda a mixed bag leaning more towards “mostly FFLs.”

        My local has both, for instance.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I can find several people walking around with an AR15 strapped on their back with a sign that says “For sale, $1200”. That’s the actual private sales loophole.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It doesn’t have to be a gun show, can be anywhere. I’ve legally purchased a handful of guns in random parking lots.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        States Where You Can Buy a Gun at a Gun Show Without a Waiting Period or Background Check

        In the following states, private sellers (non-licensed individuals) at gun shows can sell firearms without conducting a background check or imposing a waiting period:

        Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Georgia Idaho Indiana Kentucky Louisiana Maine Mississippi Missouri Montana New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina (only for rifles & shotguns; handguns require a permit) North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

        FREEDOM

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          All you need to do to stop that is make it possible for private individuals to conduct or verify a background check without involving an FFL dealer.

          Sellers have a responsibility to sell only to non-prohibited people. Without a public background check option, that means you can’t sell if you have reason to believe they are prohibited.

          As soon as you provide the option, your refusal to conduct a check stops being exculpatory evidence and starts demonstrating malfeasance.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Of course that’s good because like 60% of pistol purchase permit denials were to black people and it was a jim crow law designed for exactly that, but yeah I remember reading about that when they ended it.

        • ralakus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Virginia implemented a universal background check law a couple years ago that banned private sales without going through an FFL so they can be removed from the list. Though I’m not sure about the other half of the country