Image is of Colombian President Gustavo Petro giving a speech at the UN in 2022.


Trump has arrived in office with the force of an avalanche; ending slowing a genocide on the one hand, while simultaneously promising a total nightmare for minorities and the poor throughout and outside the United States on the other hand. [edited for clarity; I do not actually think Trump has ended the Palestinian genocide obviously, I was making a joke - but the ceasefire is a genuine improvement in conditions for millions of people right now who are on the edge of death, so it cannot be dismissed]

It’s still far too early to truly compare and contrast his imperial strategy with Biden’s, but initial signs show that there does appear to be somewhat of a reorientation. Biden was famous for being two-faced; ostensibly offering aid and stability, while also blowing up your pipeline to ensure you did not actually have an alternative to his idea. Trump, meanwhile, seems only really capable of aggression, threatening several “allied” nations with what may as well be sanctions because of the economic harm they’d do. I suspect we’ll be debating for a long time how much of this can be attributed to the specific characteristics of Trump, or whether he merely embodies the zeitgeist of imperial decline - a wounded empire lashing out with extreme violence to try and convince everybody, including themselves, that they can still be the world imperialist hegemon.

I’ll admit it: I did not believe that Trump would actually try and go ahead with putting tariffs on basically anybody who annoys him. And while the threat could still be empty in regards to countries like China and Canada, Colombia is the first indication of the potential of his strategy. Despite some fiery words from President Petro, after Trump’s administration revealed the punishment if Colombia did not agree, it appears that Colombia will in fact be accepting deported migrants after all. It’s funny how that works.


Last week’s thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • xiaohongshu [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Each new interview Putin gives to Pavel Zarubin (he’s been giving them a lot) becomes longer and less clear.

    Imagine the Soviet command in 1945, to whom the Wehrmacht command says: “We won’t sign anything with a gun to our temple, pull the army away from Berlin.” And Stalin is like: zer gut, bitte schön, I’m leaving-leaving-leaving. Can you imagine?

    And now imagine Stalin saying: I won’t sign anything with Keitel and Jodl, they are illegitimate, they didn’t go through democratic elections, they haven’t had elections there since 1933, they can refuse to sign at any time, and then what, go to war again or something. Can you imagine?

    Am I the only one who thinks I’m in a madhouse?..

    This is the state of Russian diplomacy right now lol.

    Putin will fold to Trump, once again deceived for the nth time.

    • kittin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Putin being a massive history nerd is one of the few things that’s genuinely likable about the guy.

      Giving Tucker Carlson a 30 minute rant about Kievan Rus was chefs-kiss just like me when I’m on a date

    • companero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Imagine the Soviet command in 1945, to whom the Wehrmacht command says: “We won’t sign anything with a gun to our temple, pull the army away from Berlin.” And Stalin is like: zer gut, bitte schön, I’m leaving-leaving-leaving. Can you imagine?

      I’m convinced Putin says this because he doesn’t want to admit that the Kiev offensive was a failure. Maybe they did ask him to withdraw, but I think the only reason he actually did is because Russian forces were overextended and had no choice at the time. The successful Ukrainian Kharkiv offensive is evidence of this. Starting the SMO with what was basically a skeleton crew was a huge gamble that almost worked, until it didn’t.

      And now imagine Stalin saying: I won’t sign anything with Keitel and Jodl, they are illegitimate, they didn’t go through democratic elections, they haven’t had elections there since 1933, they can refuse to sign at any time, and then what, go to war again or something. Can you imagine?

      Russia needs a concrete deal, in writing, with full “legal” standing, and absolutely no wiggle room. I can see why signing a deal with Zelensky isn’t good enough.

      • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yeah your first paragraph is correct. The whole “Kyiv push was a diversion” narrative falls apart when you look at the forces actually deployed. Russia thought that they could just storm in, surround the capital, and Ukraine would surrender/accept the peace deal. Ukraine fighting back (and the huge amount of western/NATO support) was not calculated for in the initial stages of the war, no one thought that Zelensky would be so crazy to let his country be used by NATO to weaken Russia in a war that he would never win. NATO was never going to give Ukraine the equipment necessary to actually defeat Russia on the battlefield, NATO generals and western leaders are mad, but not that mad. It took them years to approve long range strikes into Russia for a reason. NATO/USA sending in a bunch of EA-6B Prowler aircraft and F-16CJ wild weasels (of which many airframes are retired and sitting in storage, literally spare equipment that the US could have sent at any time along with training the pilots at any time) never happened for a reason, instead we got the outdated F-16 deliveries that Ukraine only use in a defensive posture.

        • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The whole “Kyiv push was a diversion” narrative falls apart when you look at the forces actually deployed

          The Marine Corps Gazette disagrees

          It was a long shot at ending the war immediately, which was probably worth taking on its own merits, but it also pinned a huge number of Ukrainian soldiers in Kiev and the region beyond, held in reserve in case the Russians tried to attack the city, leaving Ukraine’s main field army unsupported in the east while the Russians began setting up fortified positions for an artillery-based war of attrition.