• Shirasho@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The biggest hurdle by far is that you need to compile the software you want to use from source more often that is acceptable for the average user. There is also a serious lack of proper hardware driver support.

    Linux is way too fragmented and trying to get up and running with basic apps requires way too much technical skill.

    I really do hope that SteamOS will finally solve these problems by having the backing of a foundation (company) that has years of UX experience (with multiple failures and successes under their belt) that targets a wide range of audiences. This should give hardware manufacturers confidence that developing drivers for that OS will not be a waste of time.

      • FoolHen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        That doesn’t mean that others don’t have to. I installed Debian on a partition and couldn’t get the WiFi USB stick to work. The manufacturers drivers couldn’t be installed because they were ancient, and installing a generic one for the chip didn’t work. Had to give up. In windows it’s plug and play.

        • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          I had the same experience with an old printer: Linux recognized it directly whereas Windows didn’t. I wouldn’t say that Linux has a strong disadvantage at these things.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      compile the software you want to use from source more often that is acceptable for the average user.

      Wut? I’ve been using Linux in some form or another for years and that is greatly exaggerated even for back then

      Linux is way too fragmented and trying to get up and running with basic apps requires way too much technical skill.

      Um. WHAT. most distros are just some flavor of one of the handful of major ones, like Debian (Even Ubuntu is based on Debian). If it’s a Linux application, it’ll probably work on your distro. There’s some other cases, like FreeBSD which isn’t a Linux kernel, so things differ there, but it’s unlikely you’ll be running it at home unless you’re venturing out of “average user” domain, like Arch for Linux.

      Things have never been easier

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The majority of users won’t even touch the command line if they’re on a noob friendly distro. Been that way for a long time. Only Gentoo users are compiling from source, and even then, not that frequently

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The biggest hurdle by far is that you need to compile the software you want to use from source more often that is acceptable for the average user.

      I’ve been using Linux as my main OS since 2007 and not had to do that once.

      Linux is way too fragmented and trying to get up and running with basic apps requires way too much technical skill.

      > open app store

      > search

      > install any flatpak you like

      If anything Windows is the complicated one in this regard.