Naaaah, thats just the shitlibs talking. Or so i was told.

Damn, they are so good hiding that they actually enqct policies to counteract their own racism and sexism.

Clearly they must be worse, because they want to take abortion rights away by granting them to women.

Yeah, but have you considered that both sides bad?

Painting the SRs or the dismantled soviets as bourgeois is a bit rich.

I know that the marxist framework does not explicitly say “The Vanguard is always right”, but for example in the GDR, the Vanguard itself said so. “Die Partei hat immer Recht.” The Party is always right.

And im going to be honest: If shit like the great terror is how marxist states are supposed to be, maybe they are shit states.

“The Vanguard” as you describe it was an ideological justification to describe any and all criticism of the ruling class (and yes, to me, the upper echelons of the USSR were a ruling class) as counterrevolutionary. “The most advanced of the working class” shredded the countries military leader shit on the eve of the second world war not because of existing coups, but out of paranoia. “The vanguard” in the end served only to preserve their own interests.

“The people elected SRs or did not vote majority Bolshevik? What do they know, we are the vanguard, we know whats best, lets ignore the elections and abolish the soviets.”

Thats why i dislike the concept of the Vanguard. Because never turned out the way it was promised and it never will.

Man this pic goes hard

Its just spicy air, what could go wrong?

Isnt everyone to the left of Harris a Marxust Leninist to Fox News?

You have to have leaders and then do everything in your power to not let them succumb to vanguardism.

I also lean more in to an anarchist style of leadership, but decing everything by quorum can paralyze movements or leave them without a clear message.

I am currently doimg course on both of these topics.

Yes, there is a continuum between these concepts, but there is a much better case for the idea that all ibero-romance languages are actually one language than for the “Chinese Macrolanguage”.

Hakka for example is not mutually intelligible with any of the other branches of the family, yet it is still considered to be a dialect of Chinese. Why? Because it shares the script?

The political reason, imho, far outweigh the linguistical reasons for considering Chinese to be a language rather than a family.

Aaaaaah “Chinese”.

A language family with many mutually unintelligible languages, large variantions in vocabulary and a script that us shared by all of them. And somehow we have to keep treating it as one language, so Winnie the Pooh isnt angry at us.

Both sides equally bad or something

You can argue that. It is a stupid argument, but you can argue it.

Imperialism is only when the people idont like do it.

But have you considered that both sides bad?

They have no problem funding one in Yemen.

Lol. Lmao even.

Finally, a sane fucking take on the matter.

Now where the fuck did i cheer for them? No, seriously, tell me pls where i cheered for them?

The claim is that no antisemitism was present. Thats wrong. Hooligan fucknuts got punched, yeah, but they were not the only ones attacked.