• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems weird that the hijab was the detail that you felt was worth addressing. Like looking at a burning building and being like “the landscaping is all wrong”

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was a detail highlighted by the writer of the article in the title. Is the writer saying removing a silly hat is on the same level of severity as having your strip search televised to a prison lobby?

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One, the writer often doesn’t get to write the headlines for these, could be an editor that did this. I would say details like a hijab are included in the headline because its a more contraversial thing.

    • SoaringDE@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did not interpret his comment that way. With the original Post there were two things highlighted to be wrong. One of which the commenter above adressed. He did not justify any actions other than forcing removal of all clothing during a strip search.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just think the juxtaposition is weird and in a “man did you even make it all the way through the headline?” way. I mean this with peace and love.

        Its just like what was the chain of thoughts there? Did you read the entire headline and saw the part with the broadcasted strip search and say “I need to make sure everyone knows the hijab removal is normal”?