• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea as a gun owner lol what bullshit are you shoveling?

    And that shit doesn’t happen, stop making up bullshit scenarios…not even going to speak on the fact that none of what you said or propose will stop someone from obtaining a firearm. It’s not illegal to sell privately and as you probably know prohibition didn’t work.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every other country has a FRACTION OF A FRACTION of the amount of shootings that we do, and you have the gall to sit there and go “none of what you said or propose will stop someone”, when politicians and gun control groups have literally proposed NUMEROUS extremely common sense fixes to help curb the violence. It’s fucking loons like you that rally against it ad nauseum because “DeMs CuMmInG fEr MuH gUnS!1!”. You’re nothing but a gun lobbyists mouthpiece who would rather let kids get killed so you can keep an overpowered AR than try LITERALLY anything to help alleviate the situation.

      No one is coming for my shotgun, or my handgun, or my hunting rifle. Literally no one will ever pass a law that will ban those. Red flag laws WORK. Mandatory withholding periods WORK. Banning AR weapons and bump stocks would be a step in the right direction. Pushing these laws on a federal level would help. Would it stop everything? No, but it would provide a LOT more opportunities to catch someone before it happens.

      Fuck, do something to help our kids, don’t be the barrier that makes it more difficult.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol and you’re a mouth piece for emotional ignorance…you even saying no one is touching your handguns when 95% of all gun deaths are via handguns…rifles of all kinds are around 3% of all gun deaths, and then the AR style rifles make up around 50 deaths a year…50…more kids are killed by being punched and kicked to death by an order of magnitude 10xs the amount done via AR pattern rifles.

        Wanna actually do something to help, stop focusing on guns, you’re not going to stop the violence that way. Focus on:

        We can start with:

        • Single payer healthcare

        • Ending the War on Drugs

        • Ending Qualified immunity

        • Properly funding our schools and not just rich white suburb schools.

        • Build more schools and hire more teachers for proper pay so the class room sizes aren’t 30-40 kids for one teacher.

        • UBI (at least start talking about it) once AI takes over most of the blue collar jobs.

        • End for profit prisons

        • Enforce the laws already on the books

        • Make sure there are safety nets for poor families so the kids don’t turn to violence/gangs to survive.

        • Increase the minimum wage

        • Recreate our mental healthcare so kids don’t turn to the internet for support. And to help veterans not end up as a suicide number.

        • Actively make a law to solidify Pro-choice rights. More unwanted children do not help our situation.

        • Banning Insider Trading for Congress

        • Term limits

        • Ranked Choice Voting so we can move away from a 2 party system

    • MonsterHighStan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what do you think is going to decrease school shootings? What are you proposing or support that will improve the situation?

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can start with:

        • Single payer healthcare

        • Ending the War on Drugs

        • Ending Qualified immunity

        • Properly funding our schools and not just rich white suburb schools.

        • Build more schools and hire more teachers for proper pay so the class room sizes aren’t 30-40 kids for one teacher.

        • UBI (at least start talking about it) once AI takes over most of the blue collar jobs.

        • End for profit prisons

        • Enforce the laws already on the books

        • Make sure there are safety nets for poor families so the kids don’t turn to violence/gangs to survive.

        • Increase the minimum wage

        • Recreate our mental healthcare so kids don’t turn to the internet for support. And to help veterans not end up as a suicide number.

        • Actively make a law to solidify Pro-choice rights. More unwanted children do not help our situation.

        • Banning Insider Trading for Congress

        • Term limits

        • Ranked Choice Voting so we can move away from a 2 party system

        • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So basically… Fix every other nearly impossible to fix problem first before even deciding to do anything about the actual guns, if anything at all?

          And to be clear, by impossible to fix, I mean politically, not that these problems are actually unsolvable.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you’re plan is to try and tackle something that’s written into the constitution… that’s your goal? Say it’s nearly impossible to do everything else on that list which isn’t written into our constitution…but guns… they’re easier to fix…fucking hell you all are really naive.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you’re plan is to try and tackle something that’s written into the constitution… that’s your goal?

              You mean like slavery?

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you equating slavery to owning firearms? You white privileged ivory tower types are hilarious.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nope. I’m equating slavery to tackling something in the constitution and changing it. You know, the thing you just implied was not something that could be done. I’m sure you know that and are obfuscating.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yea everyone basically agreed slavery was bad…we fought a fucking civil war over it…the majority of the USA is pro-gun. You will never radify the constitution to remove or nullify the 2nd. It’s not going to ever happen.

            • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t specify a plan one way or another. I just think it’s crazy that the talking points you presented seem pretty clearly designed to just kick this issue down the road, cause at least that way you still get to have your guns.

              And believe me, solving all those things you mentioned would be great. But why not also try and do something about the major gun issues at the same time too?

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Those “talking points” would solve our firearm violence. We don’t have a gun problem, we have a societal one. Random mass shootings are a new phenomenon…gang violence and drug violence are not. Solving these things with the list I posted, would curb our violence epidemic 100xs more than just another emotional gun law from people who don’t understand guns.

                • OrangeJoe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We do have a societal problem. We also very much have a gun problem.

                  And proposing all these other things you know won’t get accomplished is a way to shift all the responsibility away from the gun issue itself.

                  And you aren’t being emotional about even the thought of some more gun control or anything to even tackle that issue head on? Come on.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It might be because I’m not delusional about why we have the violence in the first place. I’m proposing things that actually would make a difference, another AWB or mag cap/mag ban/etc is emotional policies that will not put a single dent in our gun violence… I’m not the one kicking the can down the road, you are.

        • MonsterHighStan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those are all fantastic suggestions. In my opinion we absolutely should be taking much more drastic measures to decrease school shootings in the meantime, as nearly everything you suggest would still take at least ~15-20 years to see results. Any dead kid is too many and there are way too many school shootings.

        • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol fantastic response. And its crickets from everyone else being critical

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, not crickets. Those things sound great, let’s do them. We should do everything we can, and that also includes stricter gun laws.

            Not term limits though. It may sound like a good idea, but I implore you to research issues with term limits.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Term limits need to happen, otherwise you end up being ruled by politicians who are in a perpetual cycle of trying to stay in office.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Term limits will seal the deal to the end of our Democracy.

                Either you’re arguing in bad faith, and know this, or you’re refusing to inform yourself of the downsides.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So you’re ok with SCOTUS and other judges being appointed and no term limits? What about the POTUS, are you saying it’s ok if Trump won and kept being president as long as he continues to win?

                  Please tell me the good sides of having no term limits. Laws shouldn’t be straped to a single person.

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Buddy, I’m not going to do all the work for you. This is a well researched subject with a ton of information, it’s not some brand new idea.

                    I was mainly referring to elected positions, I’m not necessarily against term limits for Supreme Court Justices.

                    Edit: See my reply to the knob below for a few sources.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you can end with bringing your gun regulations up to speed to every other developed nation.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing will improve the situation until we make a concerted effort to shut down gun manufacturing and distribution, even forcibly removing them from the hands of criminals any way we possibly can. And since the kid-killers at the NRA won’t allow that, the answer is - this problem of mass murder in schools is only going to intensify until everyone’s child is at risk and can no longer attend public schools of any kind. And that’s only the tip of the horrific iceberg of a shitshow that’s coming to our country.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow you’re really off the deep end aren’t you…I thought most conspiracy theory nut jobs where mainly right wing…but shit you just went into over drive and leaned hard left on that one…

          • tygerprints@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am as leftist as any human being ever could be - and damn proud of it. Saying the truth always seems like “going off the deep end” to people who aren’t able to comprehend. I consider your remark proof of that.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or sold with a licensed dealer present and require that it gets properly registered.

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you get caught with a gun that hasn’t been transferred to you legally, you BOTH go to jail. If it was used in a crime, you both are punished equally for the crime. 

                • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  All firearms should be registered. I can’t see a situation where it would be unnecessary. The money used for registration can be given to the innocent victims of gun violence.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    So you want people to pay to register their firearms? And registration always leads to confiscation… Canada just pulled that trick.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The same way you enforce people not murdering.

              By jailing the people who don’t adhere to the law.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I man…so how’s that going for all the tiktok kids in gangs in the inner cities showing off their giggle switched Glocks…and no one does a damn thing…you live in lala land or in an ivory tower so bright no one can look directly at it.

      • tygerprints@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually with the new proposals to remove firearms from anyone with any kind of criminal background or mental health disorder, and the law being amended to allow this, there are ways to effectively stop people from having firearms. It’s simple humanitarian guidelines that need to be enacted. Only a churlish dolt would refuse to see the common sense of keeping guns out of the hands of men and boys.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool, how do you plan to enforce it… cause we all know that drugs being illegal…no one sells those on the black market…

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since you asked me this twice, I will not answer it again. But I will touch on the black market part, no one can enforce the black market and that’s why it’s called the black market. but just because the black market exists doesn’t mean legal market shouldn’t. if you think a firearm shouldn’t have to be registered legally because it’s possible to get it illegally, then you are missing the whole point of laws and civilization, and I’m not really sure why you’re here. 

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Registration is a tool for oppressing minorities. It’s racist, and thinking registration is going to magically stop gang violence is hilariously naive.

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not sure I said anything about gang violence. But clearly you’re a white male if you think a simple gun registration is racist. Is car registration racist? Don’t get me started on gun insurance.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m actually not, nice try though. But gun laws have always heavily been used as oppression tools towards minorities. The reason I pointed out gang violence, is because that’s where 85% of our gun homicides come from.

                Just an FYI…the car and gun comparison is silly. You can buy a car with no BG check, at any age, for cash, transport it across state lines, not register it or have insurance and drive it on private property at any age.