• 22 Posts
  • 961 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • It’s wildly worse than you think. The number of bullet ballots in swing states is around 5-12% of the total vote counts. It’s a statistical anomaly that ONLY exists in the swing states. Other things to consider:

    • There were bomb threats in only swing states.
    • There were a number of counting stations that are reporting issues with their tabulation software, again, significantly happening in swing states.
    • Polls performed prior to election accurately predicted of pretty much every downballot race, but for some reason are wildly inaccurate for predictong the President in only swing states?

    There’s odd, and then there’s statistical improbability. We’re boarding on fucking bizarre, and it’s shocking that people aren’t making a bigger deal than this.



  • I’ve been keeping up with a lot of it. The Starlink thing is likely a red herring. Spoonamoore, whose kicked this thing off, thinks that the tabulators were likely hacked before election day somehow.

    So, the bullet ballots are the oddest thing. In every single election, you’ll get a super small amount of bullet ballots, like 0.3% of them. And there’s typically a margin in which the likelihood of these things occur. You can tell there are bullet ballots when there’s more votes for a President than the down ballot candidates (i.e. other state elections), essentially signifying that somebody went and voted for just the President and no other races. They’re finding something like 7-12% bullet ballots in the swing states and ONLY the swing states, which is significant…it’s a statistical anomaly.

    So…questions start to pile up. How did so many pollsters get it wrong in only the swing states? Why were there SO MANY bomb threats in only swing state ballot counting stations? Why were there SO MANY bullet ballots in only this election? Why did Democrats win nearly every other downballot race in these elections, but somehow Trump had a massive win? Why are all of these “weird things” only happening in swing states?

    For reference on the bullet votes, a graph showing the bullet ballots percents:



  • I don’t t entirely know why your getting down voted, because I tend to agree. I entirely remember my childhood. My wife can’t remember ever existing before about 9 years old except in very few extremely specific cases. We don’t think anything terrible happened, but neither of us really know. I kinda think it’s the entire reason she’s avoided therapy, dont want to unlock Pandora’s Box.







  • … there’s an argument to be made that…maybe they didn’t vote that way.

    There’s some serious irregularities in the way votes are appearing in key battleground states. The number of bullet votes is insanely off (historically 0.1%, but somehow 7% in BG states), a historical amount of people voting blue down ballot but then voted Trump, the number of bomb threats called into ballot counting areas in BG states, and how all of the irregularities are only being found in BG states.

    It makes you step back and say… something weird is going on here.








  • Alteon@lemmy.worldtoNewsDC pizza shop faces backlash for congratulating Trump
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It’s hard to do this in a phone, and I haven’t really had time to properly respond, but here it goes.

    This doesn’t mean that the whole movement supports or advocates for these things. There’s no major effort on the right to do any of these things.

    There’s been no push back from your party leaders on these issues. You have a loud portion of your group screaming these things. Omission of acceptance doesn’t mean it isn’t implied. If there was a sizable opposition or vocal portion of conservatives stating that they don’t support these things, that would be one thing…but there isn’t.

    Are you talking about getting rid of the Department Of Education? Defending their record of educating the American people is a tough road.

    The Department has played a vital role in supporting public education nationwide. It has narrowed the gap between students of other ethnicities, and has provided beneficial assistance to low-income areas in order to provide many of these students with ways to make it into higher education. It makes sure that schools adhere to Title IX, and helps to enforce students rights within schools.

    By getting rid of the DOE without a plan to support public schools, means we’re leaving significant portions of our populace without the means to access affordable education. Sure, you can get into a voucher program, but it’s quite obvious that this is just a means to funnel taxpayer money into private institutions. What happens if/when there are no more public schools? If they remove that voucher program, where are low-income students going to go?

    This doesn’t seem likely to happen since Trump wants to keep it

    From what I understand, he’s been wanting to get rid of it and the ACA since 2016. It’s a socialized support system, and it hits all the markers of things that Trump and his cronies have been wanting to get rid of for years. I’d be surprised if he doesn’t try to take a few shots at it.

    There’s no mainstream movement on the right to strip rights from people, unless you would count abortion as a right.

    Ending birthright citizenships, ending DEI initiatives, elimination and suppression of unions and workers rights, rollback of child protection laws in the workplace. Those are all mainstream conservative movements. Getting rid of contraceptives and banning abortion is essentially forcing Christian morality upon everyone else.

    It’s clear that the right wants an uneducated workforce that they can abuse, underpay, and take advantage of, and the best way to do that is make education the enemy and let them revel in their ignorance. It’s class warfare, and I’m worried that most people on the right are unaware of it.