Could Bitcoin Millhouse be even less likeable? Yes, the answer is yes.

  • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Squinty McProudBoy should move to texas and take his racist, white supremacist, misogynist, fascist base with him.

  • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can’t the Speaker shut that shit down? Especially since he’s admitted exactly what he plans to do?

    • Oderus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Based solely on the merit of the amendments they’ve proposed, such as changing titles or a single word, they should face some sort of punishment for wasting precious time. It’s clearly meant to do nothing but waste time and guess who pays for it?

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaker does that and next time it’ll be amendments created by ChatGPT. Long ones. It’s hard to have a process that cannot be weaponized or deadlocked without removing the process entirely. Or, well, relying on people being good actors.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is kind of the fundamental weakness of our system, it relies heavily on people acting in relatively good faith.

  • Octospider@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s all we get from our politicians. Nothing substantial. Just gimmicks like this.

        • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ll take the party that is marginally better than the rest. Why wouldn’t you select the best option?

          • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would you rather be punched in the face, neck, or balls? There is no best option. The options are 3 parties who will, without a doubt, make this country less livable to varying degrees.

            • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sorry buddy, but being dragged up and offered where to be punched, I’m absolutely exercising my right to choose (and to be honest, I’m kind of thinking neck at the moment). I refuse to be a sad sack that gets punched in the balls and laments that there was no other option.

              • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Proud to choose a punch in the neck because at least it wasn’t the balls! Our political system is woefully broken.

                • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  We have systems for that. We can join the various ‘teams’ of people doing the punching and we can, as a group, demand that they change their practices - next convention the group votes on replacing ball punches with a hearty ‘punchbuggy’ to the shoulder. Several leaders run and make promises on how hearty to make that shoulder-punch, and we select someone for the next election between face, neck and shoulder. You don’t get to complain about where the 3 parties are punching if you aren’t in there telling them to change their target - otherwise you got party die-hards saying things like “we’ve always punched to the neck, and that’s what Canadians want.”

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It won’t. He has a bedrock of support thanks to basic political tribalism, and he and his handlers probably calculate that they run a greater risk of alienating their base if they run moderate, than running moderate and raising their ceiling. And given how badly the opposite strategy has worked for the NDP (which is alienating it’s base to chase the middle) he’s not wrong.

      tl;dr: if he keeps acting like a protofascist, he’ll keep his job, and he might even win if enough people feel Trudeau has worn out his welcome.

      • Oderus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        his handlers probably calculate that they run a greater risk of alienating their base if they run moderate, than running moderate and raising their ceiling

        I don’t think that’s possible. Who else will Conservatives vote for? The CPC could act like LPC/NDP and they’d still get their core voters to vote them in because as long as they aren’t ‘red’ or ‘orange’… they’re ‘good’.

        • psvrh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’d stay home on the general election, and vote for someone to replace Pollievre in the next leadership review.

          Pollievre knows he needs to keep feeding red meat to the proto-fascist base, lest they turn on him.

            • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do I have the option to vote for an inanimate object? It could be a step up.

            • Oderus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly. Not voting means your team won’t get elected and for many, it is a team sport.

              They hate the opposition more than they could hate themselves.