• lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      will it be:

      • high-quality tasteful images of people uploading terrible garbage memes in a non-sexual manner
      • sexually explicit images of people uploading terrible garbage memes
      • plain ol scat

      the possibilities are endless

  • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember reading a comment a while ago (on Reddit, ironically) which pointed out that SFW subreddits naming themselves [subject]porn are borrowing the wrong part from the word “pornography”. “Porn” is from greek pornē meaning “prostitute”, but the suffix -graphy means “to write” and is often used to indicate “the study of” the thing it’s attached to (e.g. geography, cryptography, demography, etc.)

    It would be more accurate, and perhaps less controversial, if these communities named themselves earthography, spaceography, unixograpy, etc. As an added bonus, the -grapy suffix is also prominent in “photography” which is appropriate considering that many of these communities are places where people share photos of the subject matter.

    • Trantarius@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re missing the point of the -porn suffix. Its not supposed to convey “the study of” or “images of”. Its meant to convey that viewing it is satisfying in some primitive/emotional/aesthetic way. NaturePorn isn’t just “pictures of nature”, it’s “pictures of nature that suck me in and make me want to see more”. In that regard, the comparison to sex is intentional.

  • raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not exactly comedy. What do you want us to call Earth porn? ”Reallyprettypicturesofearthbutwithoutanyhumancreations"?

    • D.J@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good point, but can’t most of them replace “porn” with, pic, or, art, work or pictures?

      • c/EarthPics
      • c/UnixArt
      • c/RetroArt
    • 50_centavos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally anything else. Earthpics, coolearthpics, globescope, naturerama, third planet…that was just 5 seconds of thinking. Using the word porn for everything just lacks creativity.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there something about the word “porn” that actually communicates “really pretty pictures of something but without any human creations” beyond its Reddit meme usage? Because it doesn’t for most people.

      Also, not all community rules and objectives need to be in the name and URL. The word “porn” in URLs is problematic for users sitting behind state or corporate internet connection though. Be kind to your local network administrators!

      • raptir@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. This usage originated well before reddit. “Car porn”, “gun porn,” “disaster porn.”

      • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Porn in the sense of something that is the sort of over the top example of a thing that elicits an almost aroused response. Like a gratuitous picture of food would be considered FoodPorn. Or like 2 perfectly machined pieces of metal fitting together perfectly would be EngineeringPorn.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m up voting this because I hope it gets a better answer than earthporn, in spite of the apparent bad faith rhetorical question.