We live on a farm. There is one residential house with a hub inside. This has two Ethernet cables running underground to an office building and a portacabin in separate locations, which then connects to little hubs which extend the WiFi into those buildings.

We now want more WiFi to reach another area even further away. This is so we can run CCTV cameras. If it’s not possible we will have to get SIM card cameras and pay monthly.

But, before we do, what else can we do? I don’t think we should really be running anymore Ethernet cables off the existing hub elsewhere as, could it overload it? It just seems a lot for one residential hub.

Could we get openreach to do something?

Any ideas PLEASE throw them my way!

  • TheCaptain53@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The most reliable way to transit data (assuming you don’t put a digger through it) would be fibre optic cable. I believe you can direct bury fibre optic cable with a piece of farm equipment, so might be something you can rent or borrow from a fellow farmer. Ethernet is not a great option because of distances and grounding.

    Another option would be use a point-to-point wireless system. I believe UniFi sell these. They’re not too expensive, but wouldn’t ship anywhere near as much data as fibre.

    Assuming you mean networking/Internet, then the job is done. Some switches on either end and you should be sorted. But if you actually mean WiFi, then using a wireless system would be best. Something like UniFi or TP-Link Omada would be good options.

  • babiha@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would upgrade all links to fiber optics. Make your measurements and you can buy custom sizes or pre-done sizes (these are cheaper) of single mode fiber with connectors. Then get used HP or other reputable make switches and the adapters. It’s all plug and chug. Look for cables that you can directly bury without need for any conduit. If you need help in identifying all the equipment, let me know.

  • bob_in_the_west@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think we should really be running anymore Ethernet cables off the existing hub elsewhere as, could it overload it?

    What does that mean?

    Where do you think the Wifi would be connected to if not the same hub?

  • AdrianTeri@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without looking at any equipment/kits first I’d suggest your viewership of videos from Cross Talk Solutions. I’ve included a few…

    Some aspects that would come to mind:

    • Yes it’s a farm which I’d expect to be mostly flat but what’s the gradient/slope?
    • With respect to the above any obstacles around the buildings or along the line of sight?
    • If they are you may have to seek the tallest building/tower in your area that beams/bounces the network around… so does costs of equipment required for such distances & fees for placing your equipment on their property…
  • PaulEngineer-89@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cameras still need power so you are running cable anyway POE is a great technology since it powers the camera AND gets the data with just one cord. Battery stuff works but it’s always cheaply built and overpriced.

    In large commercial systems the router is just a router. Internally you have a large Gigabit switch often running fiber. So a TP-Link TL-SG 24 port all gigabit and POE is $220 USD on Amazon. A smaller 8 port switch with 4 POE ports is $66 USD. Ubiquiti makes much nicer IT-grade switches for a bit more money. These should be the backbone of your system.

    Fiber is nice because it is immune to lightning and electrical issues going forward between switches and you can go to 10 Gigabits.

    Ubiquiti’s Airfi stuff can use antennas to literally do gigabit WiFi over several miles. In Western states it’s common for wireless ISPs to use these for wireless backhaul networks. But no matter what cables are much more stable no matter how good this gets.

  • Apainyc@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Running additional Ethernet cables will not overload anything. If you do not want to that , line of sight point to point WiFi works good. Especially in a rural areas without interference from other devices. We have good experience with Mikrotik. Reach out to them with specifics and they will recommend the appropriate devices

  • TFABAnon09@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Point-to-multipoint wifi is one option to achieve this, but without knowing more about the infrastructure, it’s impossible to advise if it’s suitable. You will need power at each “node” - so barns and outbuildings are great candidates for this (as are any private lampposts etc).

  • llcdrewtaylor@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuqity can do this. I have used their equipment to broadcast internet/LAN all over a farm to their outbuildings, and their fields for the data link in their farming equipment.

  • alucard13132012@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m in the States so I am not sure if these folks ship internationally or if there is a UK equivalent, but their equipment is for rural/farm setups.

    https://ayrstone.com/www/

    If this won’t work, what you will need is a WiFi AP thats high power, long range and is rated for outdoor use.

    As for overloading your hub with ethernet, as long as you have a good 1Gbps switch you should be fine.

  • MeCJay12@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends on what you mean by hub. I assume you mean some kind of ISP provided device? If so you’re probably fine up to the number of ports it has. If you’re out of ports you can buy a network switch, connect that to the ‘hub’, then connect more to the switch. Your biggest limitation will be internet speed but, depending on where you send that security camera footage, that may not be an issue at all.

    TL;DR: Run the cable to the new place and install your camera. You’ll be fine.

  • Bradcopter@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much further away are we talking? Running a line shouldn’t be an issue, but if it’s more than 300ft you should be looking at running fiber instead.

  • FrozenToonies@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get wifi antennas. My buddy was beaming internet to his parents place 5km away with 300mbps speed. As long as there is straight shot sight line you can beam fast wifi across your property easily.

    • iterationseven@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A former customer of ours had directional antennae. They were flaky and tended to get hit by lightning.

      • TFABAnon09@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We get almost no lightning in the UK compared to the US - it’s very rarely a serious consideration for things like ptp antennas.