The particular neckbeardy, fedora wearing, Sam Harris listening trend of atheism was a pretty clear reaction to the evangelical psychosis of the Bush administration.

Other geriatrics here can attest that the character of Christianity at the time was way different than it is now. These days, the fascists are more “culturally Christian” and avoid overt bible apologism. But back in the day, these people were constantly on TV spewing young earth creationism and other shit, and they were largely taken seriously. It’s hard to believe now how much time was spent “debating” evolution back then. The atheist backlash at least affected discourse aesthetically for some time, making these views laughable, which deplatformed a lot of evangelicals or made them hide their power levels on TV.

Some argue that this brand of atheism justifies imperialism. It does so really only in theory. There really is no material basis for atheists in the US to justify an invasion anywhere in the world. The truth is that Christianity is still a far more powerful force for imperialism. Bush said that God told him to invade Iraq. I don’t see any president saying anytime soon that the US needs to secularize a country through force.

If fundamentalist and political religiosity were defeated, then belligerent atheism would dissolve, but the reverse is not true.

Overall, it really does seem like people over emphasize this group of internet no-lifers because of the cultural cringe they manifested.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Agreed. And sometimes religions can spin off from philosophical :brainworms: or even be made whole cloth as grifts for their own sake, such as Scientology.

    :reddit-logo: New Atheists are often subscribed to :soypoint-1: SIMULATION THEORY™ :soypoint-2: which is impossible to prove and has no point to it in practice except dehumanizing some people as “NPCs” by those that believe in it, and it really is just a fancy dressed up deism pretending to be something atheistic.

    Also, a lot of :reddit-logo: New Atheists and other capital-R “Rationalist” types believe in :soypoint-1: THE SINGULARITY™ :soypoint-2: which often has magical thinking features like robot gods of the future conjuring up heavens and hells for the atheistically blessed and the atheistically damned. It’s just religion pretending it’s not a religion, complete with prophecies, saints, sinners, scripture, dogma, the flock, the heretics, the apostates, and more.

    • ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      More and more people are saying Hans Blumenberg, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age and the idea of secularization by eschatology are worth understanding to better understand the techbros.

        • ChestRockwell [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah I’m just ready for the same shit as the early church that Blumenberg describes. They start out believing the eschaton is near, it’s any day, but then when it doesn’t happen, you have to create a worldly politics and secularize.

          The trouble is the politics the new techbros religion will create is probably going to be so demonic.