• antifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Close; it’s your mother’s brothers, bc they would have the gene from the maternal grandmother

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well my mother doesn’t have a brother, just a sister. Does that mean I might grow a boob on my head? Hmm… I don’t remember that from biology…

    • bdonvrA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      All my maternal uncles ARE bald, fuck.

      Though mid-20s and no sign yet.

      • Moghul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every man on my mother’s side (even once or twice removed cousins, my grandfather’s cousins, everyone) has male pattern baldness. The women have relatively thin hair in their old age. On my dad’s side, he and his father both have full heads of hair into their old age. I turned 30 this year and no sign of baldness yet, but I do dread a day when someone tells me they see a bald spot at the back.

        There’s still hope. And I’m holding onto that hope like crazy.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both my maternal grandfather and my maternal uncle are bald. I’m 43 and have a beautiful head of hair.

    • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So it’s on the x chromosome right? Your mom gets one from your grandpa and your grandma, so wouldn’t both grandpa and your uncles be the correct answer?

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bit more complex than just the X chromosome. 80% of men will get male pattern baldness either way. The age of onset is what changes the most, but the X chromosome only has 6 of 63 genes involved. So, yes, but also no.