• 4 Posts
  • 2.29K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle




  • They explicitly said they only make games out of interesting new tech or gameplay mechanics. Then, they polish it with QoL and riffing ideas with said concepts (usually version 2). They don’t continue unless they have enough new fun things worth to fill an entire game. They mention each of half-life’s things. They experimented with blob physics and ice physics for HL3 but finally decided it wasn’t enough to fill an entire game. The blobs returned as Portal 2 liquids, as the portal gun already added enough variety and fun things to do with it. So they made that instead.

    They don’t care all that much about storytelling or resolving cliffhangers, unless they come from some gameplay. Telling a story is never the driving force in their games. Gameplay is.





  • Nuclear has gone the other direction. Nuclear power is more expensive now than it was when it began, and is only getting more expensive.

    Ask why? don’t just stay with oil companies PR talk points. Nuclear is expensive because innovation has been artificially stifled. A huge part of this, is the insistence to forbid newer designs and more modern improvements, and instead force new plants to use old technologies and models that rely on on-site bespoke construction, as well as arcane and arbitrary administrative processes. Nuclear power is expensive (in the US), because it was made expensive by refusing it all the factors that typically reduce costs of technologies. Nuclear power never got to take advantage of the things that made solar and wind power cheaper, because oil companies lobbied with a shit ton of money to prevent it.

    It doesn’t matter though. Nuclear power could’ve help us survive climate change…40 years ago. It’s too late now anyways. Even if we covered the whole planet with solar power and stopped every single combustion engine in existence, we are already on the way to living in a hellscape. We must focus on survival of the species now.




  • The discussions here are a bit prosaic, though valid, but on a higher philosophical view you can check Descartes Discourse on the method. It is the basis of all natural sciences and the philosophical foundation of science and rational truth establishment. Maybe grab an explaineer on those ideas.

    There are further developments that discuss the sociological proceeds of the scientific community. But the best start point is to always check any statement of truth and fact for four things: controversies, criticisms, corrections and praises. With those four elements you can assert for yourself the credibility of a source’s claims.


  • OP left no indication of whether they enjoy or not. Just that it is hard. And it is hard. Broadcasters are trained formally to do it. It requires improvisation skills, acting and physical and mental stamina. But, it can also be very rewarding. Like most things in life, there’s some level of initial discomfort and hardship involved in getting to do or experience cool things. You get to choose what you want to face or not.


  • dustyData@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzAnon questions our energy sector
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The argument I’m replying to is a classic “not perfect, thus not worth it”. Its disingenuous and it calls for disingenuous reply. We are also pursuing renewables in despite of their political and technical flaws. The point is that all the flaws that OP exposes about nuclear power also applied to renewables (at one point in history solar power was 10x more expensive than nuclear) and also to oil. They are status quo defending arguments designed to halt thought, paralyze action and scoff change. Just because it isn’t perfect doesn’t mean it isn’t better.


  • Get a producer or anyone with you and talk to them. That’s how radio and TV broadcasters used to do it. They would talk to the console or camera operator. Eventually it becomes natural to talk by yourself. It does look like unhinged behavior without the context. But it is an old skill, as old as radio broadcast. Try acting monologues to yourself, it also helps.


  • dustyData@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldElmo fanboys
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s an awful take. Most of the whales and people caught in the casinos who suffer the highest financial loses are neurodivergent or people with mental illnesses, kids with their parents credit card, the elderly and overall the most vulnerable to manipulation. Those are the people that the gambling mechanics specifically aim for.





  • It means nothing, it’s just a paycheck you sign and then you get to say “I certify my OS is Unix”. The little bit more technical part is POSIX compliance but modern OSs are such massive and complex beasts today that those compliances are tiny parts and very slowly but very surely becoming irrelevant over time.

    Apple made OSX Unix certified because it was cheap and it got them off the hook from a lawsuit. That’s it.