RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前cloudfare badlemmy.mlimagemessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1291arrow-down1293
arrow-up1-2arrow-down1imagecloudfare badlemmy.mlRickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square109fedilink
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 年前They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well. This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.
minus-squareplanish@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.
minus-squareBoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 个月前Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.
They have existed for over a decade wtf are you on about. They’re publicly traded and doing very well.
This is more nonsense in a thread full of nonsense.
That suggests they’re less likely to try to frantically monitize in a way that risks killing their brand’s reputation. Maybe they’ll stay nice indefinitely.
Anyone providing services for a profit could pull a Unity at anytime. Still, I think you need more for the “slippery slope” argument.