Summary

Australia has enacted strict anti-hate crime laws, mandating jail sentences for public Nazi salutes and other hate-related offenses.

Punishments range from 12 months for lesser crimes to six years for terrorism-related hate offenses.

The legislation follows a rise in antisemitic attacks, including synagogue vandalism and a foiled bombing plot targeting Jewish Australians.

The law builds on state-level bans, with prior convictions for individuals performing Nazi salutes in public spaces, including at sporting events and courthouses.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The thing is this just makes it “cooler” among the Nazis because now it’s illegal. It plays right into their persecution complex. It also opens up a legal morass of trying to define a hand gesture in court. To me this seems like it’s fighting the symptoms and not the underlying problems.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nonsense.

      Courts are good at figuring out what constitutes an illegal action. It’s what they’re intended to do and what they have been doing since the dawn of civilisation.

      I don’t really care what Nazis think is “cool”.

      It’s addressing the underlying problem by communicating the seriousness of the threat of fascism to everyone.

    • Matombo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A Nazi/Hitler salut was always illegal in Germany after WW 2 and courts figured it out what counts as a nazi salute and what not (it often comes down to context i guess).

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The thing is this just makes it “cooler” among the Nazis because now it’s illegal.

      Only until they are caught.

    • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It also opens up a legal morass of trying to define a hand gesture in court> It also opens up a legal morass of trying to define a hand gesture in court I feel like that part would just be the same way porn is treated, "I [the judge] know it when I see it]