It literally doesnt though. Its because of how our votes are tallied, First Past the Post. If a third party ever reached viability, theyd just split the same half of voters with whichever large party theyre closer to

America has never been good at defeating geurilla forces

Please. Please leave. That would unironicallly be fucking wonderful

Was gonna say, wheres the fascism going retro?

Death, no. Just losing all that campaign funding

Thanks for answering the question, excuse me if your position doesnt make a lick of sense. I would think harm reduction is a worthwhile goal if Gaza is such a travesty, but I guess nuking the whole place would be better apparently

That would still be a poor comparison, itd affect queers here in America, not halfway across the world

Ill keep that in mind if we end up at the same camp

You know were the ones wholl get censored and not the nazis though

So youd rather the candidate whod worsen the genocide and do one here? Great logic that

One life spared would be harm mitigation and therefor justification. Gaza is not a moral boolean variable

Does it matter bro? They sold out all the women and queers in America for a country that hates women and queers. (Im lgbt i can say that)

Usually because Palestine. I fucking swear if 7 million stayed home over Palestine…

I know that feel. Worst part is that probably will happen to us

You really saw this and thought “great opportunity to shill veganism”

Speak for yourself, I thought it was hilarious

This. So much this. Im tempted to try at the House just to see how well a campaign built on exactly this and progressive economics works

This only works if a new centralized network doesnt take its place, Blueskys existence kinda proves thats not always the case

Heres the thing with federation

It will always be more complicated, and lead to smaller segregated communities. This mitigstes the network effect social media services rely on

I did, for one