Most people do not read the article link that’s posted. So I put an AI summary of the link as a comment, but as a spoiler so if you don’t want to engage with it you don’t have to and also the full article so people can more accessibly read the article. Also as a spoiler so it doesn’t take up a full page of a comment. It got removed by a mod as AI slop.
I could use AI on a headline and you would never know the difference. I could just say it’s my own summary also probably wouldn’t know the difference. Punishing people for being transparent about using LLMs who are not forcing the reader to engage with them is a net positive and a good practice to teach. The opposite is people still use them and just pretend they aren’t.
I wonder if there’s a difference between that and outward bigotry. Nope must be on the exact same level. If you truly believe they were on the same level wouldn’t you ban all users who admit to using LLMs? Because I would hope you would ban anyone who admits to bigotry and not just remove their comment.
disengage