Most people do not read the article link that’s posted. So I put an AI summary of the link as a comment, but as a spoiler so if you don’t want to engage with it you don’t have to and also the full article so people can more accessibly read the article. Also as a spoiler so it doesn’t take up a full page of a comment. It got removed by a mod as AI slop.

I could use AI on a headline and you would never know the difference. I could just say it’s my own summary also probably wouldn’t know the difference. Punishing people for being transparent about using LLMs who are not forcing the reader to engage with them is a net positive and a good practice to teach. The opposite is people still use them and just pretend they aren’t.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    10·
    1 day ago

    I’m glad to hear you have found a way to use AI that isn’t stealing the data and work of other people and is also using all of the extra green energy capacity we have thereby not contributing to global warming at all.

    If you think that “but it’s okay if you don’t want to see it” is a good argument in favor of this you’ve got some more thinking to do.