Some people say it naturally looks uncanny for them, but it doesn’t happen to me, I can’t really spot them… One trick to try is counting the fingers, but what else can I do?
Some people say it naturally looks uncanny for them, but it doesn’t happen to me, I can’t really spot them… One trick to try is counting the fingers, but what else can I do?
Would the background “forest” in this “AI”-generated image be an example of this? The one that I circled in green. It looks oddly repetitive, I don’t think natural forests are this regular…
Ah my advice was mostly for digital drawing stuff as that’s what I look at most often, oops
I think in this I’m drawn to the buildings and snow. they kind of look like they’re bleeding into each other and aren’t as rigid as they should be. but yea, the trees definetly look off. to get that sorta blur you’d have to blur the background or have a camera’s focal length set to… whatever i don’t know shit about cameras. that happens in photography of landscapes a lot, but doesn’t make sense to be right next to something that isn’t blurred at all.
Oh, and now that you point it out, you’re right, some of the buildings are curved in a way that I don’t think physics support…
Advice for digital drawings is good, too (I sometimes look at digital drawings and share the ones that I liked, wouldn’t want to be accidentally promoting “AI” stuff because I didn’t notice), I just kinda picked the first picture that I had at hand for practice