It makes me really sad to realize Mike Judge was only wrong about one thing in Idiocracy… that it would take 400 years for us to get there…because here we are, not even 20 years later.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You could just as easily make a case that’s about “nurture” more than “nature”. Stupid and negligent people will make bad parents regardless of genetics.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s a very sympathetic reading. I’d suggest watching the opening of the film which very clearly frames the story in terms of “evolution,” “breeding,” “genetics,” and “intelligence.”

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        True, but it’s only about eugenics if you think that intelligence is a primarily hereditary trait rather than a learned one.

        • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Agreed. The Idiocracy==eugenics concept seems to be localized entirely to the internet, and seems to be paraded around by those that understand neither literature, nor how human genetics actually work. Evident by how they glaze over the remaining 80% of the opening sequence that’s about the juxtaposition between American idealism, and the reality of what American culture actually promotes and produces.

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Because they prioritised their work, which is extremely common.

          It is harder for older couples to have children.