I reported that, but no action was taken.

Calling for ethnic cleansing of Kurds at the hands of Islamic fascists should be against the rules… right?

  • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
    7·
    6 days ago

    Thanks for the summary. I think in cases like this, as uncomfortable as it can be, it’s important to have the full text so I wouldn’t worry about posting relevant links in this comm. I’ve seen the link now. I’ll have a think.

    My first thoughts are: what do you and they mean by Rojava? If they mean to limit it to a particular set of relations that amount to a US proxy, that’s one thing (and quite a claim but possibly not a call for genocide). If they’re using Rojava more like you, as the Kurds in that part of the world, it’s quite another. Both readings seem possible, which is problematic.

    • multitotal@lemmygrad.mlOP
      35·
      5 days ago

      My first thoughts are: what do you and they mean by Rojava?

      The person I was talking about calls the people of Rojava “terrorists” and then says they’re gleeful about “what’s coming to them”. The only country that calls SDF/YPG/Rojava/Kurds terrorists is Turkey.

      Forgive me if I don’t care about racist terrorists who are literally tearing my home piece by piece. They wanted assad gone for so long, well now they have it.

      …

      I’m going to be gleeful that terrorists are reaping what they’re sowing.

      We have a person literally advocating for Turkey (a founding member NATO state) to ethnically cleanse Kurds from Rojava (because they are terrorists), but that’s alright, cause SDF took money from the US.

      Rojava is not “tearing [Syria] piece by peace”, they are actually defending Syria’s integrity against Turkish invasion. Yet this person doesn’t see it that way, why is that so? Perhaps he thinks Turkey has the right to go in and ethnically cleanse Kurds.