• doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’ve always felt like video games are the only realistic avenue where the Indiana Jones series can expand. In live action form, the character is just too tied to Harrison Ford, but with video games they can just keep making new Indy adventures set in his prime.

      The franchise also just naturally lends itself well to video game action

      • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        There were some good clones of Tomb Raider and Indiana Jones point-and-click games. I really wish they had stopped making prequels and sequels after Last Crusade.

          • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 days ago

            I forgot this series existed, I think there’s an episode where Indy meets Lenin and Ho Chi Mihn lol. But I was more talking about how Temple of Doom and Last Crusade were prequels to Raiders of the Lost Ark (I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure they take place some years earlier than Raiders). I wouldn’t mind a new TV series like Young Indiana Jones, but they really need to let Harrison Ford rest unless they have a really good script and director.

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              10 days ago

              Just get another actor to play the guy. The idea came from Spielberg wishing he could make a Bind film in the first place. The character is more of an archetype and costume than a real character. The Mummy from 1999 is also the second best Indiana Jones movie.

              • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                10 days ago

                The Mummy was a very fun movie. The sequels were okish, I never saw the standalone Scorpion King movie because I didn’t know it existed. The Tomb Raider Lara Croft movie was also a lot of fun for the time.

                • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Scorpion King is hilarious. The Mummy sequels were pretty dissapointing, they weren’t too bad but the first movie was just so damn FUN. Haven’t seen the Tomv Raider movie. Mask of Zorro from 1998 is also severely underrated. It’s an amazing action movie even though the biggest stunt is a dude standing on two moving horses at once. Also like The Mummy it’s a pretty horn movie in a fun way, except way more cause Zorro. Like swordfight where zorro and lady cut each others clothes off with skillfully swordwork fun horny

                  • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    Mask of Zorro is awesome too, and I think the villain in that one is some Spanish/Mexican Guasano and an American General that wants to conquer California, and they use slave labor to mine gold. The first Tomb Raider movie is really weird, because it sort had the effect of the Mortal Kombat movie, it’s good, it does change a lot of the lore and plot. But the thing is, the Movie actually influenced the games to change a lot of stuff (just like the Mortal Kombat movie), Tomb Raider Legends literally has a 1:1 reaction of the mansion that was used in the movie. And Angelina Jolie was good as Lara Croft, too bad the movie becomes silly as it goes on, but tbh the games were never that serious.

              • Redcuban1959 [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 days ago

                I’ve always been confused about the dates of these movies, probably because I have numerical dyslexia, and Crusader starts in 1912 and jumps to the 1930s. I think Raiders is from 1936 and Crusade is from 1938/39?

      • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        You’re absolutely right. This is really the only way to get more Indiana Jones content, which is something I didn’t even realize how much I wanted more of until I started this game. It’s such a great character.

        • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          more Indiana Jones content

          What, you mean Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and Dial of Destiny didn’t scratch that itch??? shocked-pikachu

          But yeah, the character just doesn’t work as an old man and really doesn’t work as a really old man. Kingdom also tried subbing in the Soviets as a 1:1 replacement for the Nazis which was very classy