Oh it is 100% connected. The new policy was brought into the spotlight because of the UHC CEO’s death and people are pointing at policies like that for the lack of sympathy for the CEO. The death may not be directly related but it just brought a ton of negative press toward them that was not there a month ago when the policy was announced.
Bold move when vigilantes want to put limits on CEOs lifespans
This was actually announced a month ago. They just announced a couple hours ago that they are reversing that decision…for some reason.
Holy crap they are, oh man I’m not saying I necessarily believe it must be connected but the optics are hilarious either way.
Oh it is 100% connected. The new policy was brought into the spotlight because of the UHC CEO’s death and people are pointing at policies like that for the lack of sympathy for the CEO. The death may not be directly related but it just brought a ton of negative press toward them that was not there a month ago when the policy was announced.