They support Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, HuggingChat, and Mistral.

  • nu11@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    497·
    14 days ago

    I don’t understand the hate. It’s just a sidebar for the supported LLMs. Maybe I’m misunderstanding?

    Yes, I would prefer Mozilla focus on the browser, but to me, this seems like it was done in an afternoon.

    • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.worldEnglish
      112·
      12 days ago

      It seems like common cynicism. Mozilla adds this feature, as not to yield major features to other browsers. Mozilla’s lets you natively have lots of different AI solutions to pick from.

      Not every feature is for everyone. Not every feature is done being improved on at release.

      And in spite of popular opinions, organizations don’t do just one thing and then do just the next thing and the thing after that. Organizations can and do focus on and prioritize many things at the same time.

      And for people who are naysaying AI at every mention, it has a lot of great and fascinating uses, and if you think otherwise, you really should try them more. I’ve used it plenty for work and life. It’s not going away, might as well do some nice things with it.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      116·
      14 days ago

      I want my browser to be a browser. I don’t want Pocket, I don’t want AI, I don’t want bullshit. There are plugins for that.

          • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
            11·
            11 days ago

            i know it is an unpopular opinion around here. but currently AI features open doors for sales. that is important.

            for the software i help develop, we introduced an optional AI integration. just its presence allowed us to sell the main SW multiple times. the AI plugin was never sold so far.

            investment AI: 2 weeks of gluecode. i am not concerned with finances, but that plugin is for sure net positive.

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              11·
              9 days ago

              Do users like the AI integration, or is this just something the management class wanted to see? Right now, those clothes look crazy good on that emperor…

              • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
                1·
                9 days ago

                right now we don’t have any real customers that use it - as the plugin did not sell yet.

                but from testing at customer sites with real people that would use it - we got only positive feedback. which is not hard to imagine: the RAG + LLM enables less experienced users to navigate a huge and complex network of information.

                but it for sure is also a buzzword execs like to see: they talked to us because we have AI. saw that the main product is good. bought the main product and decided the AI is too expensive.

                in the end it doesn’t matter to me. the 2w of AI was a fun sidequest and it left us with a passive boost for sales.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    391·
    14 days ago

    Unpopular opinion, I think they’re doing it right as well as it can be at least. It’s completely optional and doesn’t seem to be intrusive.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    361·
    14 days ago

    Thing is, for your average user with no GPU and whp never thinks about RAM, running a local LLM is intimidating. But it shouldn’t be. Any system with an integrated GPU, and the more RAM the better, can run simple models locally.

    The not so dirty secret is that ChatGPT 3 vs 4 isn’t that big a difference, and neither are leaps and bounds ahead of the publically available models for about 99% of tasks. For that 1% people will ooh and aah over it, but 99% of use cases are only seeing marginal gains on 4o.

    And the simplified models that run “only” 95% as well? They can use 90% fewer resources give pretty much identical answers outside of hyperspecific use cases.

    Running a a “smol” model as some are called, gets you all the bang for none of the buck, and your data stays on your system and never leaves.

    I’ve been yelling from the rooftops to some stupid corporate types that once the model is trained, it’s trained. Unless you are training models yourself, there is no need for the massive AI clusters, just for the model. Run it local on your hardware at a fraction of the cost.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      311·
      14 days ago

      There’s the tragedy with this new feature: they fast-tracked this past more popular requests, sticking it into Release Firefox.

      But they only rushed the part that connects to third parties. There was also a “localhost” option which was originally alongside the Big Five corporate offerings, but Mozilla ultimately decided to bury that one inside of the about:config settings.

      • MrOtherGuy@lemmy.world
        112·
        14 days ago

        I’m guessing that the reason (and a good one at that) is that simply having an option to connect to a local chatbot leads to just confused users because they also need the actual chatbot running on their system. If you can set up that, then you can certainly toggle a simple switch in about:config to show the option.

    • ilhamagh@lemmy.world
      5·
      14 days ago

      Can you point me to some resources to running smol llm?

      My use case prob just to help “typing” miscellaneous idea I have or check for my grammatical error, in english.

      Thanks, in advance.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      31·
      14 days ago

      Last time I tried using a local llm (about a year ago) it generated only a couple words per second and the answers were barely relevant. Also I don’t see how a local llm can fulfill the glorified search engine role that people use llms for.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        4·
        14 days ago

        Try again. Simplified models take the large ones and pare them down in terms of memory requirements, and can be run off the CPU even. The “smol” model I mentioned is real, and hyperfast.

        Llama 3.2 is pretty solid as well.

        • Lojcs@lemm.ee
          3·
          14 days ago

          These are the answers they gave the first time.

          Qwencoder is persistent after 6 rerolls.

          Anyways, how do I make these use my gpu? ollama logs say the model will fit into vram / offloaing all layers but gpu usage doesn’t change and cpu gets the load. And regardless of the model size vram usage never changes and ram only goes up by couple hundred megabytes. Any advice? (Linux / Nvidia) Edit: it didn’t have cuda enabled apparently, fixed now

          • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
            5·
            14 days ago

            Nice.

            Yea I don’t trust any AI models for facts, period. They all just lie. Confidently. The smol model there at least tried and got it right at first… Before confusing the sentence context.

            Qwen is a good model too. But if you wanted something to run home automation or do text summaroes, smol is solid enough. I’m using CPU so it’s good enough.

      • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        14 days ago

        They’re fast and high quality now. ChatGPT is the best, but local llms are great, even with 10gb of vram.

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    293·
    14 days ago

    Didn’t want it in Opera, don’t want it in Firefox. I mean they can keep trying and I’ll just keep on ignoring this shit :/

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    23·
    14 days ago

    I wish I had telemetry on such features.

    I really doubt a significant number of people use AI chatbots often enough that having it in a dedicated sidebar is worth it.

    • treadful@lemmy.zipEnglish
      2·
      14 days ago

      I’ve never had the urge to use a chat bot personally, but I’m pretty sure I’m in the minority. Lots of people use these things all the time for so much stuff we probably wouldn’t even consider.

      I’ve worked with a few people that all but rely on these things to produce any creative work they have to do.

      Maybe we run in different circles but I think a lot of people don’t even talk about how they’re using it.

  • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    195·
    14 days ago

    why a fucking chatbot? translate a page better for me you fucking losers, all the translation options suck for privacy outside of specifically trained local AIs. this is the BEST use case for a small local LLM yet mozilla with all its brains and resources couldnt rub two neurons together for this.

    or they could do character prediction on your typing to make typing faster. just some legit examples, why waste resources to build a chat ai into my browser when i can just open a website???

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    14·
    15 days ago

    as someone who’s never dabbled with ai bots, what does this feature do? is it only to query for information like a web search?

    • Furball@sh.itjust.works
      14·
      14 days ago

      It just adds ChatGPT or similar to your sidebar. Chatbots can do a lot of things, they are mostly good for information research and technical help, although they have serious flaws like hallucinating false information sometimes

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zoneEnglish
        2·
        13 days ago

        good for information research and technical help

        i’d say they are good precursors for information research… never trust them, but use them to find terms to search for reliable sources

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      112·
      14 days ago

      It is a sidebar that sends a query from your browser directly to a server run by a giant corporation like Google or OpenAI, consumes an excessive amount of carbon/water, then sends a response back to you that may or may not be true (because AI is incapable of doing anything but generating what it thinks you want to see).

      Not only is it unethical in my opinion, it’s also ridiculously rudimentary…

      • TheMachineStops@discuss.tchncs.de
        41·
        14 days ago

        It gives you many options on what to use, you can use Llama which is offline. Needs to be enabled though about:config > browser.ml.chat.hideLocalhost.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          5·
          14 days ago

          and thus is unavailable to anyone who isn’t a power user, as they will never see a comment like this and about:config would fill them with dread

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          11·
          13 days ago

          There’s a huge difference between something that is presented in an easily accessible settings menu, and something that requires you to go to an esoteric page, click through a scary warning message, and then search for esoteric settings… Before even installing a server.

          Nothing was compelling Mozilla to rush this through. In addition, nobody was asking Mozilla for remote access to AI, AFAIK. Before Mozilla pushed for it, people were praising them for resisting the temptation to follow the flock. They could have waited and provided better defaults.

          Or just wedged it into an extension, something they’re currently doing anyway.

    • Ephera@lemmy.mlEnglish
      5·
      14 days ago

      From the description in the UI, it does sound like it. Theoretically, a chatbot could be created where you can ask questions about the webpage you have currently opened, so if you don’t want to read a long article, for example. I guess, you could probably just throw a link into an existing chatbot either way, but yeah, direct integration might be convenient either way.

      Well, or a chatbot could be created, which has access to your browser history, bookmarks and tabs, so you can ask it when you last saw certain information. However, you’d need a locally running chatbot for that, which makes it more difficult to implement.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      12·
      14 days ago

      I think Mistral is model-available (ie I’m not sure if they release training data/code but they do release model shape and weights), huggingchat definitely is open source and model-available

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      101·
      14 days ago

      There are no open source ai models, even if they tell you that they are. HuggingFace is the closest thing to as something like open source where you can download ai models to run locally without internet connection. There are applications for that. In Firefox the HuggingChat uses models from HuggingFace, but I think it is running them on a server and does not download from?

      The reason why they are not open source is, because we don’t know exactly on what data they are trained on. We cannot rebuild them on our own. And for trustworthy, I assume you are talking about the integration and the software using the models, right? At least it is implemented by Mozilla, so there is (to me) some sort of trust involved. Yes, even after all the bullshit I trust Mozilla.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        3·
        14 days ago

        It’s “open weights” if they are publishing the model file but nothing about its creation. There’s some hypothetical security concerns with training it to give very specific outputs for certain very specific inputs but I feel like that’s one of those kind of far fetched worries especially if you want to use it for chat or summarization and the comparison is getting AI output from a server API. Local is still way better.