Colten Williams began putting together his Christmas light show a decade ago at the behest of his grandmother, who was inspired by light shows she had seen on TV.

But trouble started brewing in Kingsville after several neighbours lodged complaints about their street being crowded with cars for six weeks every year.

This month, the city enacted a new bylaw that would force the Williams family to apply for a permit for their display while also placing restrictions on the number of hours they would be allowed to leave the lights on.

“They basically limited the amount of hours I could have my show from about 28 hours a week down to 10 hours a week,” Williams said. “So you have 500 hours, 600 hours worth of set up time just to have 40 hours the lights on all month long. That’s an insane amount of work.”

Rogers said the council is sad to see them turn off the lights but said the show had outgrown its location as well.

“We were saddened to learn that the Williams family will not move forward with their light display this year,” he said.

“Our discussions with the family last year at a council meeting we both agreed that they had outgrown the neighbourhood.”

Rogers went on to say that the city had tried to work with the family to find an alternative location but was unable to meet their demands.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I feel like I need to see pics of the parking situation/attendance on the street. Like, yeah… Lights are fun and that sucks, but also… this must have been a pretty big fucking problem if it warranted this kind of response. Article says the show would end after 20 minutes and immediately an entirely new crowd would filter in to replace the previous one. Sounds like lot of vehicles waiting to get in to view it in a residential neighborhood not designed for that kind of volume. I’d probably bitch to the council too after several years of enduring that.

    • Odo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      The address is pretty easy to find. It’s a terrible spot for crowds, with no lots or sidewalks.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      And really the big problem here is the cars, 20 cars takes up a lot more space than even 60 people. People could even fit on the lawn if space allows. The cars make noise honking and running, they are the ones with bright lights. If everyone got off a bus, watched a show, and walked to the next stop it wouldn’t be nearly as problematic. Perhaps a designated area nearby where cars are expected to park and people and their family could walk to see the show could have been a solution.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        And this is why north american suburban neighbours in how they are designed suck IMO. You need a car to get around, even just to go get milk.

        Suburban neighboorhoods should really be designed like communities with mixed density housing, small shops that you can walk to, pedestrians and cyclists trails that connect two points quicker in a shorter distance then by car. Mixed zonning for offices and businesses and nothing over 6 stories.

        Designing suburbs like this would allow the density required for a tram line and mixed transportation modes. It would also potentially solve suburban sprawl that then compounds the “car is king” problem.

        Everything mentioned above is possible, but requires people to accept a level of change.

        Think how Amsterdam as a whole transformed its self starting in the 1970-1980 from a gridlocked “car is king” mentality to pedestrian and livability first approach.

        https://www.fastcompany.com/3052699/these-historical-photos-show-how-amsterdam-turned-itself-into-a-bike-riders-paradise

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Perhaps a designated area nearby where cars are expected to park and people and their family could walk to see the show could have been a solution.

        If there’s any space nearby that could reasonably hold, say, 50 parked cars. If there’s a mall, or an office building that’s empty at night, within a few blocks you could maybe make it work, but not in the middle of a large area of houses.

        My guess is that there would still be problems, though, because it’s cold outside in December and nobody seems to know how to dress for the weather anymore. They’re using the cars as portable heat sources.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think them using cars as portable heat sources highlights the car centric part of our culture. We would rather drive what is basically a private living room and view the attraction in that thing.

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              My home town used to put lights all over their waterfront, with cool moving light shows and stuff, it was something i really enjoyed as a kid and got us out and walking by the water in winter. I haven’t seen them do it to the same scale as when i was a kid for many years. It used to be dozens of displays, now there are just a few trees that get lights. I wonder if people not wanting to leave their cars influenced it. Soon the santa parade will be stationary and we can all just drive past it at this rate.

              • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I think it really just came down to costs and city budgets. Cities always seem to cut public funding allocated for things like this when trying to balance their budgets.

                That is why I find a few of the comments that were suggesting the city should hire the man a little counterintuitive. The first thing the city would cut would be the light show saying it’s to expensive and to extravagant, probably in the same year they hire him even.

    • Dalvoron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m sure there’s some particular joy in doing this to your own house, but the city should hire this guy to do a big display in the city centre. Probably more adequate parking, people maybe make a night of it and go to local restaurants, you could pick your place to minimise upsetting neighbours.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Once a hobby turns into a full time job it looses its meaning. Plus being hired means you are no longer your own boss.

        Also, we seem to forget cities always cut budgets for things. It used to be the city may have decorated its streets with lights or setup decorations in public plazas. A city may have also had it’s own light show that diminised in quality year after year, now a distant memory due to skyrocketing costs.

        There may have been public fireworks show or a puplic skate rink. All those things usually are the first to go in a effort to save cash when city funded.

        This man was doing a economic service to his town in terms of tourism on his own dime. The city shot it self in the foot here, then they tried to have their cake and eat it too asking him to pay for pirmits