• TrippaSnippa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Tuvok is the best depiction of a Vulcan in all of Star Trek too and I will die on this hill (Spock is half human, so I am not counting him). Tuvok seemed to me like he found humans (and Neelix) to be illogical, difficult to understand, and somewhat annoying; but nonetheless he couldn’t help but like them as well, though he wouldn’t admit that to them (tangential hot take: Vulcans claim to suppress their emotions, but they still make decisions based on emotion and rationalise them as being based on logic after the fact)

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Overall I like Tuvok as a character. My problem with Tuvok is they write him as if Vulcans have no emotion. He even says that.

      Vulcans are supposed to have such strong emotions they need to constantly keep them under control and use logic to make decisions because the emotions cause them to make bad decisions.

      I think that’s a lot more interesting for a character. Nemoy said he played Spock as a guy who was constantly in wonder at things and keeping it under control.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        One thing I think that determines if something is good or bad sci-fi is if the components of the show can be used to look at us humans to improve ourselves. An alien race that doesn’t have emotions doesn’t give us a vessel to use to discuss issues humans have and how we can improve. A race with very strong emotions who have recognized making decisions with emotions as a basis, rather than logic, is dangerous is useful as a tool to teach lessons.

        This is what makes Star Trek good sci-fi and Star Wars bad sci-fi. There are very few lessons to learn from Wars, if any. Almost all of Trek is in service to this (at least in the good shows). It’s also why the books of Dune are good, but the 1984 version sucks. The miniseries I think are underrated and more people should give it a try. (It’s very campy. Just a warning. If you can watch old Trek you’ll be fine though.) I’m yet to make up my mind of the new Dune. It’s entertaining, and seems to maintain most of the message from the books, but we’re yet to see.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        With few exceptions, they’re also supposed to also have mastered their emotions very handily. Partly fue to exceptional biology. Not absolutely constantly be on the verge of breaking into tears or a rage, a la Enterprise.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sure. My problem with the writing is they write him like he doesn’t understand emotions having never had the them. When it should be the opposite.

          He should be more like an alcoholic who doesn’t drink anymore. Still understands what it’s like to be drunk or hungover.