• Norin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You hated Discovery because it was too woke.

    I hated Discovery because it wasn’t woke enough.

    We are not the same.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I hated Discovery because it was written like a chorus of monkeys with typewriters and not a single one of them got close to Hamlet.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I dislike it because of “shit wrapped in shiny”, and the black lead woman only capable of doing one expression of emotion: you put it up my ass! But wait maybe I like it?

    • Guy Fleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Picard: “We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity”

      Tilly: “I went to Elon Musk junior high school”

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yea, Discovery is the best case for virtue signaling being a real thing, which is unfortunate because Trek’s literal entire thing is coming off as “common sense” while spreading a progressive message through allegory.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I have to say, I tried really hard but holy crap was the “in your face-ness” of it a problem for me and one of like 5 reasons I can’t stand it.

        It’s definitely not any of the concepts, etc. Good to see diverse, women-strong, etc casts and plots. But a lot of it was written A) incredibly poorly, like to try to appeal to middle schoolers, B) it couldn’t stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

        Edit: and I’d argue they dropped nearly all of the progressive parts of, say TNG. Or, like, where adults acted like grownups.

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          it couldn’t stop telling us REALLY LOUD and artificially how progressive it was, and it was jarring and annoying.

          Do you have any examples of this?

          Edit: Well, they edited their comment and have replied to a bunch of other people yet haven’t responded here so… I’m going to go with no. They don’t have any examples of this. Mainly because it didn’t happen.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Even then, Trek hasn’t really pushed the boundaries for a good long time. When it hit it big by TNG/TOS Syndication, it ended up being the cash cow, and thus not worth risking for such controversial things.

        At most, it’s just been nudging the norm, but the kind of radical shove that TOS had, and nearly got it pulled off the air twice is basically nowhere to be found.

        At most, we got one or two token characters or plots, but a lot of it is mostly the norm, or just a little ahead of it.

        Compare it to something less established and free to take on more risk, like the Orville. Since it doesn’t have the big brand that networks want to keep reaping without sowing, it gets a lot of flexibility Trek doesn’t really have any more.

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, really. There wasn’t much enlightened future stuff going on and they pointlessly killed (and then returned, but still) one of the gay guys for shock value(?). It’s just so poorly written that neither that nor any of the empowerment messages landed for me.

      • FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah… exactly. Although after all that I only fully gave up on the show when they jumped forward in time to a depressing future in which the Federation had dissolved. Like, way to completely and utterly miss the point of the setting. I’m gonna go cry into my earl grey now.

        • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I thought it was because they’d received enough backlash from yet another TOS era setting/characters which contradicts canon and finally listened to advance the story into post-NEM territory. Instead they went to ludicrous speed and completely overshot everything.

        • kshade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I was totally on board with that premise, thinking they might basically do their version of Andromeda mixed with late-season Enterprise. But then the actual plot happened.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I hated it because half of the characters annoyed me and the other half didn’t have enough screen time

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I fucking loathe the series for introducing “Frieza” (the half mecha character), and IMMEDIATELY killing her off. Finally a somewhat interesting character, and they get fucking rid of her. Pisses me the fuck off

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I was more annoyed at the klingon subtitle style/font being difficult to read quickly. Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

      • SatyrSack@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Each one talking like a kid who just shoved a whole pack of Big League Chew in their mouth from all the prosthetics also bothered me.

        Even worse than how bad the Ferengi were with that

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You know, you just reminded me of the episode of Enterprise where the Ferrengi took over the ship. And I was surprised how much I enjoyed (most of) it, and thought the first act where they didn’t bother giving the Ferrengi subtitlea, everything was communicated without the benefit of dialog.

          I’m sure everyone else hated it, especially because of some of the weak plot points and how there wasn’t supposed to be any contact with the Ferrengi for 200 years and because everyone hates Enterprise.

          On the other hand, it had Jeffrey Combs.

          • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            especially because of some of the weak plot points and how there wasn’t supposed to be any contact with the Ferrengi for 200 years

            What got me was that Ferengi, when originally introduced, were practically completely unknown to federation despite rumor and conjecture. Yet by the time DS9 premiered they’re long established in alpha quadrant economics