• kshade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I’d say making an obvious analogy is being less in-your-face than transplanting one of today’s problems onto the Federation’s future society. The layer of fiction is what makes it effective IMO.

    Nobody will feel called out by the ridiculously hate-filled half-black half-white aliens, but if one group was black and the other was white it would be a different story. Making them green and purple would also be less effective because people could just map those to human skin tones. That, I think, is what people would find in-your-face. Doing it the way they did on TOS (aliens of the week that literally look the same except mirrored, no clear good/bad side) puts the ridiculousness of the concept itself front and center, not how the story could be a direct translation of our current issues. And it allows the protagonists to react accordingly as well.

    The black-and-white aliens aren’t a subtle analogy but I think it’s smarter than people give it credit for.

    • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      I agree that allegory can be effective in ways that tackling issues head on isn’t, but the opposite is equally true. I don’t think addressing real world issues in a very direct way like DS9 did with Benny Russell or the Bell Riots made it a worse show in any way.

      Regardless, as far as I can see, Discovery never went the “Benny Russel” route. They operated more like TOS did - they presented a diverse crew working together while addressing issues like fascism, isolationism, and climate collapse allegorically.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Then you’re using a meaning of “in-your-face” that I’ve never seen before because I don’t know how much harder they could have shoved a “racism is bad” message at the audience.