• finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 days ago

      A) anything that weakens the US and US military is objectively good for humanity.

      B) maybe some will be disillusioned enough after the purge to create distractionary forces the government can further weaken itself on by suppressing them

      C) it’s really funny the idea of some asshole that spent his entire adult life killing kids for money getting purged because he didn’t want to do the bare minimum ass kissing required to kill more kids for money, like they have morals, standards, or some idea of dignity.

      • TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Maybe I just don’t understand why this would weaken the military. It doesn’t seem like it would be that disruptive to them in the grand scheme of things.

        • finderscult@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          4 days ago

          Anyone competent is loyal to the constitution, not any one president or government. To get to be a general you’re going to be in the military though at least four admins, so loyalty to even a single party is stupid. So if these trials are followed through with, everyone competent will be out.

          Additionally this jumpstarts the yesman downward spiral of competency; if you bring bad news contrary to what the fascist leadership want to hear, you’re eliminated, leaving people that will only lie to the admin, leading to the admin to have false information, leading to bad orders, leading to people having to lie about the failure of those orders, and so on. Usually this can take a decade or more to cause a failure, but if you start the cycle with a highly visible purge, even if you don’t kill those purged, that cycle starts near the end of the cycle.

          Tldr creating loyalists that have to bend reality to stay employed will lead to a spiraling effect of decisions and failures based on nonreality that will eliminate those creating loyalists.

      • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        it’s very narrow i guess, people who are retired and completed the 20 years for a pension before 60? some clause lets the military call those people back to active duty or something. but you go down the joint chiefs of staff they’re almost all 60+ and the retired ones are definitely older so whats the point?

        they could change the rules ig but the chilling effect of something like that would be insane, the entire military hierarchy will be terrified to do anything for fear of getting fucked 20 years later for it lmao