back in my map era, we’re ukrainemaxxing right now


Declarations of the imminent doom of Ukraine are a news megathread specialty, and this is not what I am doing here - mostly because I’m convinced that whenever we do so, the war extends another three months to spite us. Ukraine has been in an essentially apocalyptic crisis for over a year now after the failure of the 2023 counteroffensive, unable to make any substantial progress and resigned to merely being a persistent nuisance (and arms market!) as NATO fights to the last Ukrainian. In this context, predicting a terminal point is difficult, as things seem to always be going so badly that it’s hard to understand how and why they fight on. In every way, Ukraine is a truly shattered country, barely held together by the sheer combined force of Western hegemony. And that hegemony is weakening.

I therefore won’t be giving any predictions of a timeframe for a Ukrainian defeat, but the coming presidency of Trump is a big question mark for the conflict. Trump has talked about how he wishes for the war to end and for a deal to be made with Putin, but Trump also tends to change his mind on an issue at least three or four times before actually making a decision, simply adopting the position of who talked to him last. And, of course, his ability to end the war might be curtailed by a military-industrial complex (and various intelligence agencies) that want to keep the money flowing.

The alignment of the US election with the accelerating rate of Russian gains is pretty interesting, with talk of both escalation and de-escalation coinciding - the former from Biden, and the latter from Trump. Russia very recently performed perhaps the single largest aerial attack of Ukraine of the entire war, striking targets across the whole country with missiles and drones from various platforms. In response, the US is talking about allowing Ukraine to hit long-range targets in Russia (but the strategic value of this, at this point, seems pretty minimal).

Additionally, Russia has made genuine progress in terms of land acquisition. We aren’t talking about endless and meaningless battles over empty fields anymore. Some of the big Ukrainian strongholds that we’ve been spending the last couple years speculating over - Chasiv Yar, Kupiansk, Orikhiv - are now being approached and entered by Russian forces. The map is actually changing now, though it’s hard to tell as Ukraine is so goddamn big.

Attrition has finally paid off for Russia. An entire generation of Ukrainians has been fed into the meat grinder. Recovery will take, at minimum, decades - more realistically, the country might be permanently ruined, until that global communist revolution comes around at least. And they could have just made a fucking deal a month into the war.


Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    21 hours ago

    TLDR : China is Issuing US Bonds now … gangster-spongebob

    spoiler

    The story around China issuing USD-denominated sovereign bonds in Saudi Arabia is generating an enormous amount of buzz in China, and could potentially be immensely important.

    I strongly suspect it’s a message to the upcoming Trump administration.

    Let me explain what seems to be going on.

    On the face of it, it’s not a major story: China issued $2 billion in USD-denominated sovereign bonds in Saudi Arabia, which means that investors lent USD to the Chinese government that they promised to pay back. That’s what a bond is. So far, relatively boring.

    The first somewhat interesting aspect of it is that the bonds were oversubscribed by almost 20x (meaning $40+ billion in demand for $2 billion worth of bonds), which is far more demand than usual for USD sovereign bonds. Typically US Treasury auctions see oversubscription rate between 2x to 3x so there obviously seems to be very strong market appeal for China’s dollar-denominated debt.

    The second interesting aspect is that the interest rate on the bonds was remarkably close to US Treasury rates (just 1-3 basis points higher, i.e. 0.01-0.03%), which means that China is now able to borrow money - in US dollars (!) - at virtually the same rate as the US government itself. That’s the case for no other country in the world. As a benchmark, countries with the highest credit ratings (AAA) typically pay at least 10-20 basis points over US Treasuries in the rare instances when they issue USD bonds.

    The third interesting aspect is the venue itself for this bond sale: Saudi Arabia. This is unusual since sovereign bonds are typically issued in major financial centers, not in Riyadh. The choice of Saudi Arabia and the fact that the Saudis agreed to this is particularly significant given its historical role in the global dollar system, the so-called ‘petrodollar’ system which I don’t need to explain… By issuing dollar bonds in Saudi Arabia that compete directly with US Treasuries, and getting essentially the same interest rate, China is demonstrating it can operate as an alternative manager of dollar liquidity right in the heart of the petrodollar system. For Saudi Arabia, which holds hundreds of billions in dollar reserves, this creates a new option for investing their dollars: they can invest it with the Chinese government instead of the US government.

    Ok, that’s all interesting but still not the main reason why Chinese social media is abuzz. The reason why is because they postulate that this is trial round by China to demonstrate to the US that they can effectively use their own currency against them, with potentially dramatic consequences.

    How?

    First of all, think it through, imagine if China scales this up and instead of issuing $2 billion worth of bonds, they start issuing 10s or 100s of billions worth of it.

    What this means for the US is that China would effectively be competing with the US Treasury in the global dollar market. Instead of countries like Saudi Arabia automatically recycling their dollars into US Treasury bonds, they could put them into Chinese dollar bonds that pay the same rate.

    This would create a parallel dollar system where China, not the US, controls part of the flow of dollars. The US would still print the dollars, but China would increasingly manage where they go. Imagine that…

    Another critical aspect is that every dollar that goes into Chinese bonds instead of US Treasuries is one less dollar helping to finance US government spending. At a time when the US is running massive deficits and needs to constantly sell Treasury bonds to fund itself, having China emerge as a competing dollar bond issuer that can match Treasury rates could pose immense financing problems for the US government. It could effectively end the US’s so-called “exorbitant privilege”.

    But wait, you might ask yourself, what’s the point of China having so many dollars? Don’t they transfer the problem to themselves: they too need to find a place to invest all these dollars, don’t they?

    You’d be right, the last thing China needs is more US dollars: in 2023 it ran a US dollar trade surplus of $823.2 billion, and for 2024, it’s expected to be $940 billion. China is already absolutely awash with dollars.

    But that’s where the beauty of the Belt & Road Initiative comes in. Out of the 193 countries in the world, 152 of these countries are part of the BRI. And a very common characteristic many of these countries have is: they owe debt in USD, to the US government or other Western lenders.

    This is where China’s strategy could become truly clever. China could use its US dollars to help Belt & Road countries pay off their dollar debts to Western lenders. But here’s the key: in exchange for helping these countries clear their dollar debts, China could arrange to be repaid in yuan, or in strategic resources, or through other bilateral arrangements.

    This would create a triple win for China: they get rid of their excess dollars, they help their partner countries escape dollar dependency, and they deepen these countries’ economic integration with China instead of the US.

    For BRI countries, this is attractive because they can escape the trap of dollar-denominated debt (and the threat of US financial sanctions) and get likely better conditions with China, which will help their development.

    In effect this would China placing itself as an intermediary at the heart of the dollar system, where the dollars still eventually make their way back to the US - just through a path that builds Chinese rather than American influence and progressively undermines the US’s ability to finance itself (with all the consequences this has on inflation, etc.).

    At this stage you probably tell yourself “come on, there’s no way China can do that, the US government surely has tools at its disposal to prevent this stuff”. And the answer, surprisingly, is that there is actually little the U.S. can do that doesn’t undermine them in some shape or form.

    The most obvious response would be to threaten sanctions against countries - like Saudi Arabia - or institutions that buy Chinese dollar bonds. But this would further demonstrate that dollar assets aren’t actually safe from US political interference, further encouraging countries to diversify, compounding the problem. The dollar’s strength partly comes from network effects - everyone uses it because everyone else uses it - but as we’ve seen with Russia sanctions create a coordinating moment for countries to move away together, weakening these network effects.

    Another option would be for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to make US Treasuries more attractive. But this would be self-defeating: it would increase the US government’s own borrowing costs at a time when they’re already struggling with massive deficits, potentially triggering a recession. And China, getting similar rates as the US, could simply match any rate increase.

    The US could also go for the “nuclear option” of restricting China’s ability to clear dollar transactions but this would effectively immediately fragment the global financial system, undermining the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency - exactly what the US wants to avoid. And with China being the most important trading partner of the immense majority of the world’s countries, nothing is less sure that the U.S. would win at this game…

    In short this seems to be like some sort of Tai Chi ‘four ounces moving a thousand pounds’ (四兩撥千斤) move by China, using minimal force to redirect the dollar’s strength in a way that benefits China.

    Like I wrote at the beginning however, at this stage this is most likely just a message by China to the upcoming Trump administration: “we can do this so maybe think very carefully about all the nasty things you have in mind for us…” The beauty of this move is how strategically elegant it is: it costs China almost nothing to demonstrate, but forces Washington to contemplate some very uncomfortable possibilities.

    @ Arnault Betrand

    • KnilAdlez [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This is an incredibly smart move on China’s part. But what about Saudi Arabia? What do they stand to get out of making this deal? Is it a bet on China’s future?

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Any other finance nerd please correct me if I made any error:

        Saudi Arabia has a ton of Dollars (because of their trade/current surplus with the U.S.). These Dollars are an Asset for the Saudis and a Liability for the U.S. Fed/Treasury (depending on what form its held cash, treasuries etc).

        When Saudis buy this debt, they give their Dollars (U.S. Govt Liability) to China. The debt is a liability of China, not the U.S., they can’t freeze it because they didn’t issue it. Of course, they could try freezing China’s foreign reserves but then China will no longer sell them goods. And the higher than treasuries interest rate is a bonus.

        When China pays back, the debt will be slowly converted back to U.S. Govt liabilities (Cash).

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Paraphrasing Yanis Varoufakis, the Saudis look at how Russia has been sanctioned for “human rights” violation, see their own human rights record, then decide they’d really rather do anything they can to keep themselves away from the sanction-crazed neoliberals.

      • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They get Chinese-made commodities, technology, and infrastructure projects. It’s absolutely a win-win for everyone involved but its long term effect is making the US leverage over countries weaker.

        The US can of course can attempt to make this illegal by sanctioning the use of the dollar in this way, but that speeds up the loss of use of the dollar because its reliability will faulter

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Another option would be for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to make US Treasuries more attractive. But this would be self-defeating: it would increase the US government’s own borrowing costs at a time when they’re already struggling with massive deficits, potentially triggering a recession.

      U.S. Government can simply stop issuing debt (“borrowing”) to “fund” its fiscal deficits if they really wanted. They don’t want to because the interest benefits the rentiers.

      This problem still remains though. Dollar holding surplus countries are more concerned after US froze Russian foreign reserves

      The most obvious response would be to threaten sanctions against countries - like Saudi Arabia - or institutions that buy Chinese dollar bonds. But this would further demonstrate that dollar assets aren’t actually safe from US political interference, further encouraging countries to diversify, compounding the problem.

      • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        They are the ones selling the bonds, and the bonds are very highly subscribed, hence they don’t need to set higher rates. China isn’t “getting the rates” they are setting them in response to market demand. If the bonds were worse subscribed then they would probably have higher rates.

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I think that China are capable of just setting the rate to be whatever they want because they already hold so much USD due to the trade surplus with the US.