• falcunculus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I disagree, the poor would be worse off without public transit since else it’d be much harder for them to move around. In fact many if not most public transit systems are subsidized and operate at a loss.

    The richer don’t use it and so care little, beyond the macro level that it benefits businesses and such.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think you may have missed his point. He wasn’t arguing against public transit, just the fare. It should be free. For the reasons you yourself mentioned.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Public transit never turns a profit, not because it’s bad business but simply down to the economics of providing affordable transit. In fact, fares recover such a small percentage of a public transit agency’s budget that there’s good arguments being made for making public transit fare free. Public transit is a net good for communities so making it as accessible to those who want or need it is important