• coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate that we have to live in this world where something as vital as archiving the internet is a volunteer-based operation that requires permission from copyright holders. In a better world, the Internet Archive would be an international enterprise funded by mandatory contributions from UN members, and IA would have open license to archive everything. Maybe they wouldn’t allow regular users to access archived items that have active copyright, unless the items become inaccessible.

    • realcaseyrollinsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good grief that sounds horrible. I don’t want the government to be in charge of what gets preserved and what doesn’t.

      • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I go back and forth on this. Clearly there are downsides to a service being provided by a government agency. But someone has to be in charge of it, and every option has downsides. Obviously a for-profit private venture is the WORST option. The current system of volunteer/nonprofit is great, but lacking in stability, funds, and power to push back against copyright. You could argue that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, I just think it would be nice if my tax dollars supported vital services like Internet Archive or Wikipedia.