I rarely feel attacked when I talk with people in person. And we all take people feelings into consideration enough so no one is trying to attack anyone.

I was not actively commenting on social media since I was 13. But when I joined Lemmy i saw the statistics only 1% of people are actively posting and commenting on social media. And since I knew I was in 99% of people who are only consuming and really wanted Lemmy to take off I tried to be more active.

But now I find myself way too often attacked and attacking. And I always judged people that are attacking others on Xitter or Facebook.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    All the people here saying, “Just block them” - personally I just can’t help suspecting that these are the same people who themselves are insulting and abusing others, who in turn are saying “Just block them”.

    The solution is not that everyone blocks everyone else. The solution is that we behave civilly and respectfully to each other.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The solution is that we behave civilly and respectfully to each other.

      Is it an achievable solution? Because I have no idea how we could make that happen.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        On reddit I was once literally told to go fuck myself for saying it was a nice day. There are psychotic people everywhere, and I really do agree the solution is just to block them. When someone’s comment to me consists of “You’re an idiot” or some other insult, I generally block them. And no, that’s not how I comment.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      The solution is that we behave civilly and respectfully to each other.

      is this your first day on the internet?

  • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I believe it’s similar to road rage. You are very restricted in your way of communicating and cannot read the other’s emotions at all. That means you have to interpret a lot more and that is done in your own state of mind, meaning you can easily take offence where non was meant and the other has no chance to de-escalate as they would in face-to-face communication.

    Ignoring trolls and actual assholes, that kind of misinterpretation happens so easily, I’ve often seen it among friends (via chat) and my own mother raged about an email I sent her (which was then de-escalated by a single sentence in a phone call). That’s also the reason, sarcasm works so poorly online.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Someone will see ANYTHING as an attack on the internet. The default interpretation is, “How can this comment be an offense against me and everything I believe in?”

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a loud toxic minority online. The block feature is best friend.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Lots of people here missing the “and attacking” part.

    Breathe, chill. That commenter you’re about to yell at is just another idiot, like you. We’re all just idiots bored on the internet. Relax, it’s not that deep.

    Also:
    NO, FUCK YOOUUUUUUU

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mike Tyson once said “Social media made y’all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it.” There are things people would only say behind a keyboard.

    It can be hard not to get upset over mean comments but I try to remember I have hundreds of pleasant Interactions with people daily and I shouldn’t put so much weight on the few negative interactions with random internet people.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, this is a big thing. A sentiment that comes to mind is “we judge other people by their actions, but ourselves by our thoughts”. Sometimes I reread past comments of mine and cringe at how ambiguous the tone is.

  • Badabinski@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I used to have this problem all the time, I think it’s pretty normal. I did many years of therapy, and part of what I got out of that was an understanding of how people deal with pain and anger. The best way to change someone’s mind is to try to empathize with their position and show your understanding. Once you share context with them, you can gently explain why you feel the way you do. Sometimes, you do this and find that the other person’s point of view is a more accurate reflection of your values and you change your mind instead.

    Don’t do this with bad faith actors though. just block them.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    there is nuance in personal interactions that is stripped away via text so it’s very easy to type something you think is perfectly innocuous in spoken word that doesn’t translate at all and because you know what you mean the return attacks don’t make any sense. The only way to stay sane in these environments is to be as objective as possible and be prepared to take on new information and be wrong.

    all that aside, if someone is personally attacking you they aren’t worth any time beyond hitting block, and the quicker you get at it the better your online experience.

    • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      there is nuance in personal interactions that is stripped away via text so it’s very easy to type something you think is perfectly innocuous in spoken word that doesn’t translate at all

      Good point. I will add that on the internet you are not even sure the person is a native English speaker. Which add another barrier.

      And now that I think about it, they may be even cultural differences that can have an impact on subjects like politics.

      All of that will some groups try to brainwash us into buying their products or their hateful ideology.

      But there is something I liked about the old Reddit and here on Lemmy/Mastodon is that we still can some self introspection like Op did

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I start to feel irked I imagine it’s Colin Robinson on the other side so there’s no reason to engage.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yes…

    It’s easier to be an asshole to words than to people.

    xkcd #438 (June 18, 2008)

    Personally, I think that we (humans) haven’t really socially adjusted to digital communications technology, its speed or brevity, or the relatively short attention span it tends to encourage. We spent millennia communicating by talking to each other, face to face, and we’re still kind of bad at that but we do mostly try to avoid directly provoking each other in person. Writing gave us a means to communicate while separated, but in the past that meant writing a letter, a process that is generally slow and thoughtful. In contrast, commenting on social media is usually done so quickly that there isn’t much thoughtfulness exhibited.

    We’ve had three-ish? decades exchanging messages on the internet, having conversations with complete strangers, and being exposed to dozens, hundreds, even thousands of other people reading and responding to what we write… less than one human lifetime. We’re not equipped for this, mentally, emotionally, historically. Social and cultural norms haven’t adapted yet.

    • Acamon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Totally agree. Seeing how “Internet like” communication existed before the Internet is always fascinating to me. Whether it’s fanclubs, wargaming zines or Enlightened era correspondence, people have had written interactions with effective strangers for centuries. But it was incredibly different before.

      The very act of sitting down to write, paying some money and effort to literally post it probably had a huge calming effect on idle bad faith takes. And I imagine that getting a letter with someone telling me names for thinking McCoy is better than Spock would probably make me feel derisively sorry for the poor nerd who went to the effort.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Yeah, and if you wrote some feedback to a magazine article, the editor might write a response to you and publish both in next month’s issue, but that would be the end of it. No one who read your feedback as published in the magazine could respond to you directly - it’s not really a conversation, it’s slow and limited by the format. You could write another message to the editor responding to their response, but that wouldn’t get published in the following issue so at most it would just be a one-to-one communication.

        This is very different from writing a post on an internet message board and getting twenty responses from twenty different people in a span of minutes. The closest past equivalent I can think of is literal soapboxing, where you go stand on a street and talk at people walking by, and they can immediately respond to you if they choose - but then that’s in person, face-to-face.