He’s right
People like you are the problem in this country.
People like you are the problem in this countey.
What’s a countey?
A typing error, shit for soul
You can’t even type correctly and other people are trash? You must have very low standards.
I have INSANELY low standards for what i recognize as reasonable person, which is why its so surprising you cant meet them.
Not surprised you consider a typo the peak of folly though. Maybe you spilled your covfefe this morning?
Nope. My covfefe was tasty.
I always gotta laugh when the people who support trump, who are the most famous group of people for pulling the whole “THATS NOT WHAT HE SAID YOU TOOK IT OUT OF CO TEXT AND TWISTED HIS MEANING” then turn around and shit out the exact same turd they’re accusing other people out of their brains. I know conservatives who don’t do this though, and I respect those people. I really, really don’t respect weak bitches like you though OP.
What a pitiful attempt at whatever
Probably shouldn’t vote for him, then…
Or kamala. You know she has the same opinion.
You don’t allow women to form their own?
No, I don’t know that…
HARRIS: This is the thing. We know we are actually fighting for our democracy. And unlike Donald Trump I don’t believe people who disagree with me are the enemy.
Trump: “These are horrible people. Oops, we should get along with everybody. They’re horrible people. Some people you just can’t get along with.”
If I’m going to choose candidates based on their own words, then Trump can go fuck himself and Harris seems pretty presidential.
He didn’t. “The only garbage I see is his supporter’s” garbage, i.e, it’s the possessive “'s”. The clue here is ‘is’, singular. If he meant a group of people, he’d have said ‘are’, plural.
Anyway, Trump called the whole country a garbage can, so if you’re so desperately offended by your misunderstanding of Biden’s comments, I guess you’re also pretty torn up about Trump’s actual comments, right?
Nice try. He clearly said all Trump supporters are garbage.
No, he didn’t. Both the context and the grammar make it clear that my interpretation is correct. Even if you interpret it unsumpathetically, the inference that it’s ‘all’ Trump supporters is something you’ve added.
Any Trump supporter pretending to be offended by what Biden didn’t actually say is in any case a massive hypocrite, because Trump built his political career on being offensive. They can’t turn around now and act all offended unless they also repudiate Trump.
None of that changes the fact that Biden called Trump supporters trash.
The fact that he didn’t call them trash is the salient point here.
I mean, apart from anything else, the word he used, whatever it was applied to, was ‘garbage’.
It was applied to Trump supporters.
No, he didn’t, bot.
People, don’t feed the troll bots.
It’s on video. He struggles to get there but he ovibiosly says it.
Nope. He says “His supporters’ [garbage]”, not “his supporters.”
But anyway. The downvotes have spoken. You’re this close to being blocked.
Edit: Lemming for 1 month. You’re part of a disinformation campaign. Good-bye.
Oh noooooooo lol
The tree of liberty is watered by the blood of tyrants.
I’d call wanting to disarm an entire populace and arbitrarily kill babies pretty tyrannical, but that wouldn’t mean we should kill people who advocate such things.
wtf are you on?
Kamala Harris supports an assault weapons ban. First of all, most firearm deaths are done with handguns rather than rifles - 59% vs. 3%. Second, I’ve yet to hear a definition of “assault weapon” that isn’t completely arbitrary. Third, there is very little evidence that the previous assault weapons ban actually reduced firearm deaths.
Also, Kamala Harris wants to “restore the protections of Roe v. Wade,” which would essentially allow abortions up to the point of birth for any/no reason. Abortion is, in the vast majority of cases, the killing of an innocent human being - the fetus/baby. That is, it’s murder of an exceptionally vulnerable person.
Dude… you’re so exceptionally wrong, it’s pretty sad
Can you explain how I’m wrong?
Easily.
First, banning assault-style rifles wouldn’t be ‘disarming’, unless you’re going to argue that any regulation of firearms is disarming. Is it dumb? Sure. Would it have any significant effect on firearm homicides? No; even most mass shootings are committed with handguns. (For the record, I own multiple assault-style rifles, and I compete in action pistol (USPSA, IDPA, etc.) and two gun matches regularly, in a non-ban state. I do oppose rifle and feature bans, because I oppose regulating tools rather than changing material conditions.)
Secondly, Roe v. Wade never allowed all abortions up to the point of birth. Roe v. Wade specifically balanced the rights of a person-to-be against the person that had to run the risk of pregnancy and birth, and said that prior to viability–broadly speaking, the end of the first trimester, but realistically more like 27 weeks–the rights of the women overrode the state interest in protecting the not-yet-life of a potential person. Beyond that, the overwhelming majority of all abortions that happen after the first trimester happen because there are defects incompatible with life, or because there’s a complication that will kill the woman if she does not terminate the pregnancy.
I’ll also note that if you really wanted to reduce rates of abortion, you would ensure that schools taught comprehensive sex education–including accurate, factual information about birth control and how to use it (e.g., none of this ‘abstinence only’ bullshit)–as well as making birth control widely, easily, and affordably available to all people.
Thank you.
So what is an “assault-style rifle” and how is banning them not disarmament? If banning them wouldn’t significantly affect firearm deaths, then why are Kamala Harris and the majority of the Democratic Party pushing for it?
On the topic of abortion, less than 8% of reported abortions happened past the first trimester. They also generally don’t happen for medical reasons. And fair point about the third trimester thing. However, given the number of states that have very little or even no restrictions on abortion, it’s likely to me that they’ll push for the same nationwide.
disarm
If a man had an assault rifle and a handgun, and he put down the assault rifle, would you describe him as ‘unarmed’? If so, I don’t think you can describe removing assault rifles as ‘disarming’ people.
No, I wouldn’t call that disarmament. If someone else took away his assault rifle by force (or threat of force), that’s disarmament. As is legally preventing someone from acquiring an assault rifle. Felons are disarmed, for example. The Supreme Court affirms that people have the right to keep and bear personal arms, and also that the government cannot legally limit that right without serious historical precedent. Funnily enough, New York State tried justifying their concealed carry legislation by citing bigoted laws from our “Anglo-American tradition.”
My point was that if the man is still ‘armed’, he hasn’t been ‘disarmed’, he just has one less (type of) gun. For example, if I told you that there was a man in my street with two guns, and then added that he’d now been disarmed (forcibly or otherwise), you would assume that he now had zero guns.
If a man had one of his arms cut off but kept the other one, you’d still call him an amputee. Similarly, if your guns are taken away from you by force, you have been disarmed. There are different degrees to this - I would argue that people who live in blue states are generally more disarmed than people living in red states - but that doesn’t change the fact that a disarmament has taken place.
Your analogy would be more like asking if a man who put his arm inside his shirt could be called an amputee.
I find it interesting that a conservative sub is absolutely riddled with liberals. It’s painfully obvious what is happening here.
Stay mad lol
I tried this place out since I can’t use reddit. I’m sick of being banned for normal thoughts. This place is so much further left but no bans lol. We just need to get more conservatives to come here.
It’s the DNC paid social media machine at work here. They’re swamping several platforms in an attempt to control the narrative.
It isn’t gonna work. And they know it. But I’m sure they are paid well for their wasted efforts.
Its not going to work with an attitude like that lol. I saw stuff about reddit being exposed. I can’t say it surprised me.
