• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Here’s what happens when we refuse to compromise. Some people care more about minority civil rights than anything else, so they get the best civil rights candidate. Some people care about feminism more than anything else, so they get the best feminist candidate. Some people care about unions more than anything else, so they get the best union candidate.

    Conservatives then rally around a putrid flesh monster who promises to shoot all the above on day one, because that’s what they care about. That candidate wins with a 40/20/20/20 vote.

    Values voting cannot solve this.

    • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      you speaking about it as though people who would vote for a conservative only have one issue: Conservative candidate. but it’s a whole platform, and it’s also diverse in its Interests

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        people who would vote for a conservative only have one issue: Conservative candidate.

        That’s literally what’s hapepning. Trump’s VP pick was incredibly against Trump until he got picked and then he got very much pro. Hell, conservative party doesn’t have a stated program, they literally don’t state any values.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        It is, but they don’t recognize the contradictions between their various factions. They will very happily rally around a candidate that promises to sweep away all the leftists. Each of them imagines that their faction will be the one on top in the end.