• Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re probably worried about articles criticising the code close to launch. No one’s gonna bother verifying, it’s a lot of effort to verify, but it sounds credible enough if someone claims Burger Technology read the code and found a potential vulnerability, or didn’t use best practice, or something is inefficient/bad code, or just like, look, here’s proof that they collect metrics, this is unprecedented spyware.

      It sucks obviously, I’m hoping it’ll become open sourced and more in the future. But I understand the business impact calculus being very different for Huawei vs Samsung or Fairphone.

      • Pili@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s actually a really good point.

        No one’s gonna bother verifying, it’s a lot of effort to verify

        I’m sure that some ultra nerd would go and read the source code. But it doesn’t matter, because even if Robert Fosslover reads the whole repository and writes on his blog that it’s actually free of spyware, nobody is gonna hear about it anyway or if they do, they’ll call him a see see pee chill.

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      There is openharmony which is open source but I don’t know its relation to harmonyos or harmonyos next. Hopefully we get slathered with communist open source software as time goes by.

      • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hopefully we get slathered with communist open source software as time goes by.

        There’s probably lots, but not in English.