• PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    @apfelwoiSchoppen But functionally, the victim didn’t die on her own, she died as the direct result of the driver hitting her. For the purpose of accurately portraying who took an action and who was acted upon, it should emphasize the driving, not the dying.

    • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The discussion was active voice vs passive voice, not functionality of active voice vs functionality of differently-worded active voice. They’re both still active voice.

      • PedestrianError :vbus: :nblvt:@towns.gay
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        @PapaStevesy IMO active voice includes focusing the sentence on the subject that did the action, not the one that was acted upon but by all means let’s argue about grammatical definitions instead of the problem of motorists killing people and journalists normalizing it. 🙄

        • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean, you’re literally the one who started the argument, being dismissive and condescending about it now just makes you look like a sore loser.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You’re the one doing that. Killed/died same difference, but I apologize for not using the same verb as the original quote for clarity.