Every liberal does it too, from center right radlibs to far-right “conservatives”: the most extreme right fringe liberals hate the mainstream liberals for not being bigoted enough, the mainstream libs hate the radlibs for not being cruel enough, and the radlibs hate the left for not being chauvinist enough.

Denouncing chauvinism in particular is like a liberal moral event horizon, a cardinal sin against their self-interested belief in the righteousness of the imperial hegemon that keeps the treats flowing at gunpoint.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    liberals despise anyone and everyone with better politics than themselves.

    That blows up on Hexbear whenever someone gets mad at vegans for talking about the actual cost and harm done by the meat industry.

    • Poison_Ivy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      People were mad at the vegan comm because they were aggressive and confrontational dicks to everyone on the site while using the patina of veganism as an excuse.

      Its why most of those very same vegans are all mostly banned off the website for their behaviors.

      Its one thing to advocate for veganism, its another thing to for example call someone a “r*pe enjoyer” to a sexual assault victim for drinking milk in a thread completely unrelated to veganism.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its one thing to advocate for veganism, its another thing to for example call someone a “r*pe enjoyer” to a sexual assault victim for drinking milk in a thread completely unrelated to veganism.

        Hexbear, pondering how it is perceived on other instances: wonder-who-thats-for

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Its one thing to advocate for veganism, its another thing to for example call someone a “r*pe enjoyer” to a sexual assault victim for drinking milk in a thread completely unrelated to veganism.

        I may have missed the worst of that; I wouldn’t have said that myself.

        I had not seen any recent examples of that, but the "vegan spoke up, how uncivil" thing percolates from time to time without anything near the insult you mentioned.

        • Poison_Ivy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was pretty much the only other experience with meeting other vegans on this site tbh, I was legit excited about more vegans being on the site…up until they started posting lol.

          Some hilariously unhinged statements did come from them like:

          Hunger isn’t a real thing. It doesn’t exist. If you make conscious decisions about what to eat based on an informed view of nutrition, you will still feel hungry. It’s not some magic signal telling you that you’re not getting enough nutrients, it’s a dumb feeling that exists in your head. You ignore it, and it goes away. The feeling of hunger cannot harm you.

          and

          Delusions may or may not go away if you ignore them, I have no idea, I’m not knowledgeable on that topic. What I can tell you for sure is that hunger does go away when you ignore it.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was pretty much the only other experience with meeting other vegans on this site tbh, I was legit excited about more vegans being on the site…up until they started posting lol.

            I’m kind of glad I either tuned it out or was just not in those subsections. I believe you when you say that happened and I remember some vegans talking about the mass bans and not liking those, but the context of what got them banned was lost.

            Hunger isn’t a real thing. It doesn’t exist. If you make conscious decisions about what to eat based on an informed view of nutrition, you will still feel hungry. It’s not some magic signal telling you that you’re not getting enough nutrients, it’s a dumb feeling that exists in your head. You ignore it, and it goes away. The feeling of hunger cannot harm you.

            wtf-am-i-reading

            Delusions may or may not go away if you ignore them, I have no idea, I’m not knowledgeable on that topic. What I can tell you for sure is that hunger does go away when you ignore it.

            galaxy-brain

            I appreciate the quoted bits of Hexbear history. Maybe some of the site’s cultural reactions toward vegans are more than lingering reddit-logo cliches. Unfortunately.

            • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.netM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I actually saw that comment first hand and it was in the middle of a thread I was in and I got so fuckin mad. As someone who has been food insecure myself for most of my life and currently cannot afford a kitchen and will be hungry till I get to work and heat up my little bowl of 3 bean chili honestly seriously fuck that person that said that and I am glad they are gone.

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I remember getting those replies when I started talking about how hard it was for me to eat enough, so I empathised with those who had the opposite issue.

            Only to be told hunger isn’t real lmao

    • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s a bad argument here when applied to libs and it’s a bad argument then as well. This notion that they’re mad at us because secretly know we’re right is pure self-aggrandizing puffery.

      • RonJonGuaido [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ya, it seems much more likely that federated “libs” despise OP/us because OP is/ we are incredibly rude to them, and in OP’s case, have a really uncharitable psychological theory about how they are secretly mad at us, rather than just concluding that such libs simply have different (and wrong) appraisals of facts and values.

        • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve always thought that the dirtbag left should be incredibly tactical about it’s dirtbagness. The fact that we didn’t entirely remove incivility from our toolbox was fantastic and certainly set us apart and up for a rollicking good time, but it did become a bit one note.

          Anyway thanks for coming to my TED talk rip www.reddit.com/r/TweeLeft

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m generally on the same page, but then I look at how other instances are treating Lemmygrad, how reddit snuffs out even the most respectful leftist comments, how cops respond to peaceful protests, etc.

            The buttoned up approach has value, but so does what we’re doing.

            • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh yeah, the real power in the dirtbag approach was it refused to give deference to mores of politeness that those in power insisted were due to them (despite being entirely unearned and used to run interference for absolutely abhorrent decision-making).

              I don’t see it nearly as useful when applied to randos online though.

              • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                It can definitely backfire. But it’s impossible to know what online randos will respond to (people change their minds in different ways) and some folks do respond to having their bullshit called what it is.

                Also important to remember the lurkers, who vastly outnumber us humble posters, and who are not going to be as turned off by hostility as the person on the receiving end of it – especially when right next to the hostility you have someone making a more conventional argument.

                • a_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I think the actually more salient issue is that, we’re openly having fun clowning on these morons. Lurkers see us having an absolute ball and opt to join in. Recall that you can point to the origin of this online subcurrent as a mishmash of SomethingAwful and largely apolitical ‘weird twitter’.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, is that not how most groups think of their “enemies”? “We’re better and they know it, thats why they do bad thing

    • Zodiark [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      struggle session also happened a week before federalification with the question of whether or not troops or veterans should be ostracized. a.k.a, ATAB.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, poor people are coerced into military service because they are systemically pressured into having few other options.

        No, that doesn’t mean “shoot and cry” in any way makes the shooting more justified. the-more-you-know