When adapting the 2019 LGBTQ romantic novel Red, White & Royal Blue for the screen, Matthew Lopez was careful to circumvent an R-rating. The film has a handful of sex scenes that stop short of full-frontal nudity — there’s some bare butts and, naturally, shirtless men.

But it wasn’t enough. Red, White & Royal Blue was rated R, meaning people under 17 would need to be accompanied by a parent or guardian to see it.

Another recent film with LGBTQ leads, the French romantic drama Passages, received an even harsher NC-17 rating, which would restrict people under 18 from seeing the film at all, and also keep it from playing in certain theatres.

  • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Part of society’s implicit notion that LGBTQ is inherently sexual in a way that heterosexuality (or being cis) isn’t. Telling kids that some kids have A mommy and a daddy is fine, two daddies is a kink that shouldn’t be mentioned. Ok well it’s either all inherently sexual or none of it is.

    • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly!

      Deviance from the norm must be exaggerated in order to be rejected, otherwise it might be mistaken for appealing by the population.

    • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This problem comes from gay men too. I have read a couple of times how gay men dont “announce” that they are gay, because whatever happenea in their bedroom is their business, as if being gay meant only getting dick in the bed. That’s a mentality that is taught in our world.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      A system that discloses what’s in the movie would be better. You see an R-rated movie and that doesn’t really tell you anything about it. Is it R-rated because you see boobs one too many times? Or because someone says “Fuck” a few more times than is ‘acceptable’? Or is it because two men kiss? Or is it because 3/4 of the movie is graphic torture?

      If there were (for example) icons for each category of “objectionable” thing, that were color coded green / yellow / red based on how many instances of that there are / how severe it is, it would let parents make actual informed decisions about what they want their kids watching (and additionally, let adults make informed decisions about what they want to watch).

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          At a point, it is going to be arbitrary regardless.

          How long do they pan over the boob? Do you see nipple? Is man chest worse? Is military violence different from gang violence? Are drugs used or glorified?

          Every question you’d ask in regards to rating a new film is entirely subjective, depending on what you view as acceptable.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are drugs used or glorified?

            Honestly this is a big one that isn’t brought up enough. There’s a huge difference between the drug use in, say, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and Requiem for a Dream.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          They do that for TV shows and I think it works out pretty well. Knowing that it’s TV-MA because of language vs. TV-MA because of nudity or TV-MA because of violence is a big game changer for many parents.

      • max@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have something like that in the Netherlands. It’s called “Kijkwijzer” (loosely translated as viewing guide) and has icons for sexual content, violence, drug/alcohol use, scary content, bullying/intimidation, etc. and age advisories.

  • HellAwaits@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the same how many conservatives couldn’t care less if their kid sees a pg-13 level of a hookup in a movie, but cries if there’s a gay couple in a pixar KID movie.

    Trust us, we’re aware of the hypocrisy.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there is a reasonable argument for “appropriate for young children,” “appropriate for older children” and “appropriate for adults” as ratings. They don’t have to be adhered to strictly or anything, but having had a young child, knowing if a film is G or PG can make a difference, not to mention PG or R.

      • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Films should be thought provoking at times. “Whats that daddy/mommy?” Should often be a question asked after the movie ends. But it’s gotta be in doses, you can’t show a 6y/o kid all of the reasons a film is rated R all at once and expect them to process it enough to ask questions

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it’s a perfect solution and I agree with you, I’m just saying we need a way for parents to know if their 6-year-old is going to be seeing people fucking and chopping each other’s heads off before showing them to the movie.

  • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    they mention a long track record of harsher treatment of queer content but I wish they linked to that data or mentioned a couple comparisons for context.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s guidelines, and according to the text above, the first movie followed them.

      But someone has to apply the guidelines, and also what’s fine or not changes over time. Something being rated R is ultimately an opinion.

      It’d be cool if there were actual standards, or at least an appeals process so a movie isn’t limited to just the first review if they feel it’s not accurate.

    • YoFrodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a whole film about how arbitrary the MPAA rulings are called This Film Is Not Yet Rated, check it out