Just pretend you’re sure that reactionaries down voting a fact that makes them feel angry doesn’t change the truth of the fact. I don’t even need to imagine. The downvoted track with my experience: most people are dumbasses.

Is this dumb denialism?

Yes, the confirmation bias must be very soothing for your cognitive disonnance. Deep down you must know there’s not going to be a ceasefire while Hamas is still clinging to power.

He asks good questions. Curiosity killed the cat, though.

He’s just smart enough to ask a good question and have an engaging interview, he’s not smart enough to ever be informed by the answers.

If you don’t use /s people just think you’re stupid fyi.

He is another Russian asset. If the CIA could do their fucking jobs I’d be very greatful.

Removed by mod

Every Trump supporter in my neighborhood is on the sexual offender registry, no joke. At first I thought “let’s go Brandon” was some like NAMBLA rallying slogan because literally there are four sex offenders around the area and they were the only people two years ago with Trump and maga shit all over their dumpy little houses. I’d rather be in the bathroom with any trans person than any Republican.

Disgusting.

The chambers will just not go to recess using pro forma sessions.

They do. Rightly so.

Oh I see what you’re saying, I thought the term was more literal than you’re suggesting.

I suppose the US president could launch a retaliatory strike based on a first strike that is still in the air, which is launch on warning, but the policy is to wait for a first strike and then have the president issue an order.

My understaning of launch on warning is any policy with no discretion, based on standing orders, not that it was necessarily strictly computer automated. The US policy is “hair trigger alert” which means that the strike systems are constantly in ready state, awaiting a valid order.

All I mean to say is that this is unlike the Russian system, which upon detecting an incoming missile issues valid, pre-approved orders to launch, with perhaps a human needed only to turn the key, but with no built in discretion once the pre-approved order is authenticated. The US does not have pre-approved launch orders.

I think counting on a coconspirator to become rational and brave is a hope. He’s president for life though and lives in a literal villain lair. Miles of impassible mountains with one way in patrolled by heat seaking drones and all matter of radio and seismic sensors, and an frigid ocean patrolled by everything up to nuclear submarines on the other. I’d put about as much faith in it as I would waiting around for natural causes or a jilted lover, a disgruntled chef, or whatever dumb luck might bring the world closer to peace.

To add to this, I think Russia has already committed to losing at least ten million people if hot war breaks out, and for Putin that would be like no big deal if it got him a good enough strategic advantage, whether it’s pushing back NATO or undermining democracy. That is to say, I hope it won’t take an utter humanitarian catastrophe to rock Putin’s goons hard enough to turn on him.

Yes thank you. What I said was that our warning system is not our trigger. Our triggers have people pulling them. I went back and hyphenated it properly for you.

Unlike Russian nuclear policy in this regard, known a Dead Hand aka Permitr, where the warning system is also the trigger.

I appreciate this comment because it’s the one thing that might stop Russia. It’s not going to be nuclear deterrence, it’s going to be internal and external pressure.

I don’t trust Putin to be rational though and neither should anyone else.

The US does not have a launch-on-warning system in place.

while the United States maintains the capability to launch nuclear forces under conditions of an ongoing nuclear attack, it does not rely on a launch-under-attack policy to ensure a credible response. Rather, U.S. nuclear forces are postured to withstand an initial attack. In all cases, the United States will maintain a human “in the loop” for all actions critical to informing and executing decisions by the President to initiate and terminate nuclear weapon employment.

https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.pdf

They aren’t though. They can drop a few nukes without suffering nuclear retaliation. Any nukes fired at Russia automatically triggers a full scale Russian launch.

So while Russia could nuke others, others cannot nuke Russia, not without triggering the end of the world.

Handout to Elon Musk, only manufacturer who can meet the EV demand.

Just one pump and dump scam after another now.

It’s a parade of one idiotic comment after another. Dude is a straight up moron.