• Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yep. It feels weird to be nostalgic for windows 7, but it was honestly not bad. I think the reason why the loss of aero glass feels cold and sterile is because it honestly is. The whole metro/material design thing is just garbage. I don’t want buttons that look like abstract squares, I want buttons that look like buttons. What brain-dead designer honestly likes minimal design over skeumorphism?

    • xep@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m no designer (although I might be brain-dead), but I prefer minimalist UI over skeumorphism.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They were trying to unify their desktop and tablet UIs (touch-driven) which itself was fucking stupid since people interact with them totally differently.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        I remember having a Wacom usb tablet at the time, and Windows kept slapping a virtual keyboard in the middle of my screen. It was infuriating, to say the least.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Especially at the time, and even somewhat still today, it saves bandwidth on virtual connections. Some places run thousands of virtual desktops for their users.

      I liked Aero better, too

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Counter-point, you could do that with skeumorphism via procedural generation by sending the base algorithms instead of icons and then rendering the icons client-side. It’s already done to a limited extent when it comes to games. Substance Designer and Painter are industry standards when it comes to creating textures and materials, and they can generate textures with resolutions anywhere from 128x128 to 8192x8192 without requiring any additional effort due to their procedural workflow. Granted, the textures are usually “baked” before actually being imported into the game engine, which is why you can’t tell a game to generate 8k textures (the game only has the rasterized textures, not the original procedural ones); however, the technology is already kinda there. That said, it can be hardware intensive, but it could be done.

        • psvrh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Counter-point, you could do that with skeumorphism via procedural generation by sending the base algorithms instead of icons and then rendering the icons client-side

          This is actually pretty close to what macOS does.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Skeumorphims is much harder to implement for varying screen sizes and resolutions. When windows 7 was first released the different screen resolutions and sizes was very limited.

      I remember Windows was difficult to use if you dual booted it on a retina MacBook. Because it couldn’t handle the high pixel density well, many applications couldn’t be scaled properly.

      Skeumorphism is also much less useful. People needed hints to help them understand what things did on their computer. Many people had limited interactions with computers, now almost everyone uses computers of some form daily (largely smartphones). The remaining skeumorphism can hinder them not help, they have no idea what a floppy disk is or why that would be a save symbol.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not related to your point, but I would argue that computer usage is actually down today compared to when 7 was released, as computer literacy is proving to be more of an issue for generations younger than Millenials entering the workforce compared to generations older than Millenials. And that’s because smartphones work differently from laptops and desktops. The UI and how you interact with your phone is fundamentally different enough to make the skills not interchangeable. I worked with kids in their first jobs for a number of years, and many didn’t have a computer in their house because they did everything from their phones.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Skeumorphims is much harder to implement for varying screen sizes and resolutions. When windows 7 was first released the different screen resolutions and sizes was very limited.

        Skeumorphism can scale, it’d just require procedural generation of assets. Granted, that can be pretty hardware intensive, but you could bake the assets for common screen sizes and include the procedural versions for future resolutions. Then again, you’d probably get people complaining about how their computer is slow for a minute or two after plugging it into a new display (because it’s baking new UI assets for the monitor’s resolution).

        Hmmm…

        Skeumorphism is also much less useful. People needed hints to help them understand what things did on their computer. Many people had limited interactions with computers, now almost everyone uses computers of some form daily (largely smartphones). The remaining skeumorphism can hinder them not help, they have no idea what a floppy disk is or why that would be a save symbol.

        Yeah, but it’s kinda the designer’s role to find new ways of visually explaining things to people while updating existing design language to account for changes in technology, culture, etc. If a floppy disk is so outdated that it confuses people when it’s used to symbolize saving files, then they need to find a new icon to symbolize that.

        Also, to be clear, I’m not against buttons having text labels to go with them (e.g. if the button’s function is difficult to convey in an image), I honestly just want buttons to look like buttons. I’m tired of all the abstract, minimalist design. I want things to look “real” again.

        Edit: an example of where procedural asset generation is widely, commercially used is video games. Believe it or not, but most game textures nowadays are procedurally generated and then baked/rasterized before being imported into a game engine. Substance Designer and Painter (material creation and texture painting, respectively) both use procedural workflows which allows them to generate textures at practically any resolution without any additional effort. The only reason why you can’t tell a game to generate 8k textures is because they’re usually baked before being imported into the game engine.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep. It feels weird to be nostalgic for windows 7

      IMO, not really, since I stuck with it until 2020, and would be on it to this day if it was a sane option. Microsoft knew how to do it right. And then, quite a while ago, they stopped.

      Also fuck the people using resolution as an excuse against skeumorphism, when Windows 95 screenshots look just fine today. Monitors are bigger and pixels are smaller and this 16-color garbage still reads clear as day.

    • SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree, I never really liked Metro and the minimalism of Material design doesn’t vibe with me either. It’s mostly a personal taste thing though, I know several others who do like minimalism.

      About it being weird to be nostalgic for Windows 7, it’s not to me, but I think it has to do with how it was the last OS I used that didn’t involve either several awful bugs to the point of unusability (Windows 10) or requiring extensive knowledge of how the system works (Linux) to daily-drive it; so I guess I look at it fondly as the last time I was “computer-innocent”, so to say.

    • Kensai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Brain-dead? I can’t take the rest of what you wrote seriously after that unnecessary qualifier.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Meh, I’m just really annoyed because modern design seems to be all about sucking life out of everything. It’s just all so flat and bland. I understand the arguments that it’s cleaner, less cluttered, less distracting, more efficient, etc. I just… it feels so… soulless.