• kirklennon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, that’s precisely my point: they don’t because no major phone manufacturer has simultaneously sold both a large and compact flagship. And when there are legitimately comparable models in different sizes, the smaller size fairly reliably sells better.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s not true. Apple sold a mini version for several generations and consistently the mini was always the worst performing version sales wise. Samsung made a mini version of the Galaxy S as well for a while. It also underperformed.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not true. Apple sold a mini version for several generations and consistently the mini was always the worst performing version sales wise.

        The “mini” lineup was never truly comparable to the flagship product. The specific deficiencies varied with the year but they were all missing an entire camera, and cameras are one of the single most important features of an iPhone.

        The mini phones were significantly and arbitrarily gimped to mark them as a distinctly (and quite visibly) lower tier phone.