No, generators usually only store things locally, unless you click a button to “share” it or things like that.

I’m not sure what you’re referring to. I’ve never seen code just be added without my typing it or asking it to write it.

Sounds like just a plain ol’ AI chatbot would be fine for that. As opposed to a preprogrammed thing that has pre-set aspects of the world it will generate. I do have a simple AI chatbot page you could try using: https://perchance.org/quick-chat

(It doesn’t save your chats, but does have an export feature explained before you start chatting.)

Just so you know… all perchance image generator pages use the same image generator. They just add different text to the prompts, as “styles.” But you can get any of the results from any of the generators on any of the other generators–because they all use the same back-end to actually generate the images.

Honestly, as someone who knows a good bit about AI generation on perchance… I have no idea how I would see anyone’s IP address that uses the plugin on any of my generators, or prompts, or results. Unless the user chooses to upload a generation to the generator’s gallery–which would allow anyone to see the prompt and generated image. (But I don’t know how you’d get an IP address from that even then.)

I assume that the server itself has the ability to see such things. But not me as the creator of the generator page. Not from the AI plugins anyway.

As the dev said, in theory the creator of the page could use JS to read such things potentially, if they specifically wrote code to do that. But as it’s not something built in the perchance-made AI generator plugins, this is more of a thing to handle on a case-by-case basis. As in, tell that generator’s creator that they’re gathering data on their users and ask them to stop it. Or go and use a different generator page which doesn’t do that.

I see. So really, it’s just private code only you can see/edit from your account, something like that. Everything runs in the browser, is the thing. Which means it will be accessible through the dev console one way or another. I’m not sure it will be possible to actually have something secure and truly hidden like this. But I guess it won’t be plain text in the code editor.

What would that mean in the context of perchance?

You should probably say what happens when you try to import.

I’ve used the AI text plugin a fair bit, but have never seen something called textStream. And it’s not listed on the plugin page. Where can I actually find it?

When you’re talking about “textStream” and such… I’m not sure what you’re referring to, and I’m quite familiar with the plugin. Is that only talking about something to do with text-to-speech?

You’re just pasting a url to set the avatar, right? You can get the url of any image you see by right-clicking it, so kinda makes sense this would be possible. They could even download the avatar image, upload it somewhere, and use that new url instead.

There’s never in the history of the internet and avatars been a way of stopping someone using the same avatar image as you.

Sweet!

@[email protected]

Oh interesting. Must use a hash or something…

Heads up: that first jpeg link works fine for me.

Sounds like it’s basically reminding the AI of some data each time a prompt is sent to it. What I do is just put it in the prompt, and it seems to work fine.

Those generators you listed all do the same, reminding the AI of things it needs to know about, but are pretty complex and have a lot to send, most likely. You can make your own Text AI pretty easily, and send whatever you like with the prompt. Maybe try that.

Thanks for the update! I get it. It’s a lot of work, and a balancing act for timing things as well. It’s hard to live up to (a minor group of) people’s expectations. But knowing what the state of play is with an update like this really helps 👍

It’s difficult. Because it’s generally trying to make one image, building from one idea.

You can try using the BREAK keyword to separate groups of meaning. Like blue hat BREAK yellow dress is more likely to not mix up the colours for the skirt and hat.

The key is, $output is a function. With properties set on that function. So, that requires some sort of build to happen when you first access $output. Your test doesn’t have any of that, which is why it works ;p

Here’s an example of properties not working correctly on an $output function: https://perchance.org/sqfppqoq6e#edit I did try various tweaks and workarounds. Got something working within the page (can’t remember how that worked now) that didn’t work when imported. But this example doesn’t even work within the page.

In another comment on this post I talked about my own expectations.

And that example I linked to in the post has some very weird behaviour being demonstrated.